Any idea why this and the second patch haven't been applied yet? Do they need more work? > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Shearman [mailto:R.J.Shearman@warwick.ac.uk] > Sent: 21 April 2003 16:32 > To: wine-patches@winehq.com > Subject: I/O Completion Ports (1 of 2) - reworked > > > > I can't believe how long it was since I posted the first version > of this. However, I have finally put the time into this to rework it. > Differences from previous version: > - Don't use variable sized messages > - Use existing code in ntdll > - Use existing code for thread wait queue in server > > ChangeLog: > - Add server (and minimal client) support for I/O completion ports > License: > - LGPL > > Rob
