Re: Is wine *always* mapping threads onto processes? (Was: Re: multiple instance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



To be sure, be the same as Saint Thomas:
issue a free before and after the launch of wine app.
So you'll see that the application uses only 32 MB, instead of 160.

> Then it probably doesn't. That Linux lists threads like processes
> would
> explain it, kind of. What still bothers me a little though is that if
> I
> start the application under Windows 2000, in the Task-Manager I see
> exactly one instance consuming 32 MB of RAM, whereas top under Linux
> shows 5, consuming 32 MB each, or so it seems. Would top give false
> information here about RAM consumption?


___________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
wine-users mailing list
wine-users@winehq.com
http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gimp for Windows]     [Red Hat]     [Samba]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Graphics Cards]     [Wine Home]

  Powered by Linux