Re: Is wine *always* mapping threads onto processes? (Was: Re: multiple inst

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Frank Joerdens wrote:

> Just for sheer politeness' sake, so as not to scare the likes of myself,
> it might just somehow say: Hey, I'm a thread and this is not *really*
> memory consumed all for myself alone, but shared amongst my sisters and
> brethren . . . ;)
>

I would guess the people who implemented threads on Linux probably figured the
person who would even interrogate system resource usage via "top" or "ps" would
most likely know what they were looking at in the first place.... :)  Even on
Windows, I think MORE people access the "Task Manager" to see what "Applications"
are running than who look at the raw process list.

Just consider this difference between Linux and Windows since there will be many
more like this that you will encounter.....

Good luck!

Peace....

Tom

_______________________________________________
wine-users mailing list
wine-users@winehq.com
http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gimp for Windows]     [Red Hat]     [Samba]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Graphics Cards]     [Wine Home]

  Powered by Linux