> > It wouldn't be necessary to keep ReWind as the "official" wine > > already let their dlls and dll enhancements to have a different > > license (as they state). > > by the way... > what do you mean with rewind being the "official" wine. > ain't the LGPL licensed wine the official one now ? I think that was "keep ReWind [comma] as the official"... _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@winehq.com http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
