Mark Hannessen <msh104.mymail@12move.nl> wrote: <SNIP> >every dll in wine can have its own license. > >This is already done a long time >for example: wineX has been using AFPL dll's since they started. Yes, but in that "long time" wine had a X11/MIT/BSD style license that allows that. >and we sometime's need to load windows dll's and they have a >different license too. ( but i guess you already knew that ) So this still true to the LGPLed wine. This makes me wonder if things wouldn't be really easy for every one if winex take advantage of this. It wouldn't be necessary to keep ReWind as the "official" wine already let their dlls and dll enhancements to have a different license (as they state). []'s Raul Dias _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@winehq.com http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
