--- phrostie <pfrostie@yahoo.com> wrote: [skipped] > as always i'm not only open to feed back but i need > it to help make the > how-to more complete. there will always be > configurations that have special > requirements. You'll get the feedback from users complains and bug reports ;-) > one question i would like feed back on, should i > keep the information on the > older 2000 version in the how-to or does this make > it to confusing? I think it is better to keep both versions of the documentation. Just mark them explicitly - Intellicad 2000, Intellicad 2001. > longer term goal would be a winelib port. for those > not familliar with the > ITC (Intellicad Technical Consortium) it has many > members and it is posible > to registar as a non-commercail member and have > access to the source code. > although the licence is not GPL, X11, or BSD in > nature it is a open source > project. this is one reason i like it. By definition "Open Source" is when there is no restrictions on modifications (see http://www.opensource.org). As I understood from your description this is not true - there are limitations who can modify the source. This is just an explanation of the terms and not in any way offence against the license. I like too that license is cooperative and pretty open. You can try to find volunteers on this mailing list or among people, interested in the application. Alternatively you can try to interest the consortium in sponsoring porting of the application. This can help to involve people who would like to help to port the application, but can't afford to spend so much time. Andriy __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@winehq.com http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
