On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, gerard patel wrote: > The right solution would probably to process some or all > X events completely asynchronously but I'm unsure if it > is the way to go. I've been thinking about related issues myself, for example, the overlapped I/O stuff. So I thought: if the wineserver notices that data is available for overlapped I/O, then the wineserver can send the wine thread a signal, then the signal handler can complete the overlapped I/O request then, instead of waiting for a WaitFor operation. Now what if then the x11drv could take advantage of overlapped I/O? I'd think an overlapped I/O completion routine in the x11drv would be cleaner than the x11drv.MsgWaitForMultipleObjects hacks Alexandre is using now, anyway, even if it turns out we can't do the aboce.
