Bulletin of the Global Volcanism Network, December 2007

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



****************************************************************

Bulletin of the Global Volcanism Network

Volume 32, Number 12, December 2007

http://www.volcano.si.edu/

****************************************************************




Bulletin of the Global Volcanism Network

Volume 32, Number 12, December 2007



Piton de la Fournaise (Reunion Island) Caldera collapse in April 2007;
large E-flank lava flows

Batu Tara (Indonesia) Thermal anomalies beginning January 2007; ash
plumes during March-October

Anatahan (Mariana Islands) During 2007-8 the crater lake dries up,
continuing ash clouds

Bezymianny (Kamchatka Peninsula) Correction to plume description in
November 2007

El Chichon (Mexico) Stable with tremor; hot spring; significant
crater-lake-volume variations

Fuego (Guatemala) Moderate Strombolian eruptions, including
pyroclastic flows, continue into early 2008

Poas (Costa Rica) Small phreatic eruption from crater lake on 13 January 2008

Guagua Pichincha (Ecuador) Seven moderate phreatic eruptions on 1 February 2008



Editors: Rick Wunderman, Edward Venzke, and Sally Kuhn Sennert

Volunteer Staff: Robert Andrews, Hugh Replogle, Michael Young, Paul
Berger, Jacquelyn Gluck, Margo Morell, Stephen Bentley, Antonia
Bookbinder, and Jeremy Bookbinder, Veronica Bemis, and Ludmila
Eichelberger







Piton de la Fournaise

Western Indian Ocean

21.231 S, 55.713 E; summit elev. 2,632 m

All times are local (= UTC + 4 hours)



A caldera collapse occurred at this massive, dynamic shield volcano
during early April 2007, displacing the 0.8 x 1.1 km floor of the
elliptical Dolomieu caldera downward by ~ 330 m (figure 1). This was
both the largest collapse at this volcano since 1760, and one of the
few large collapse events seen at this volcano. Worldwide, such events
are rarely documented by eyewitness or instrumental observations, with
best known examples of collapses including those in 1968 at Fernandina
(Simkin and Howard, 1970) and in 2000 at Miyake-jima (Kaneko and
others, 2005).



Figure 1. Maps taken from Michon and others (2007) showing location
and key geography of Piton de la Fournaise volcano on Reunion island.
The inset shows the volcano at the island's E end and indicates the
volcano's two major NE- and SE-trending rift zones (NERZ and SERZ).
The larger map indicates major features, including the Bory and
Dolomieu craters (arrows with heads to respective crater rims), two
seismic stations, GPS station SNEG, and key vents in the 30-31 March
and April eruptive episodes (1, and the main vent, 2). Note the scales
on the frame indicate distance in kilometers.



The collapse at this Piton de la Fournaise occurred in association
with the early stages of one of the largest historical discharges of
lava flows ever seen here. The resulting lavas traveled E to reach the
sea where they built a delta. Concurrent with collapse, the seismicity
and deformation were cyclic in nature, suggesting collapse proceeded
in a step-by-step manner. These and other events are explained by in a
recent paper by Michon and others (2007), the source used to compile
this report. Our last report, BGVN 32:01, discussed events through 22
February 2007.



Piton de la Fournaise has undergone intense eruptive activity since
1998, with two to four eruptions per year typically venting at the
summit and proximal areas. Five distal eruptions occurred during
1998-2007, chiefly concentrated along the NE rift zone, and in
particular, on the Plaine des Osmondes. Pahoehoe lava flows had
completely filled Dolomieu's floor, accumulating during an August
2006-January 2007 eruption to a thickness of 20-30 m.



Prelude to collapse. On 26 February 2007 seismicity started below the
summit zone. It progressively increased and over 100 events took place
daily during 28-30 March. Seismicity reached anomalously high levels
on 30 March at 2025 local time. About 2.4 hours later, a fissure began
erupting at 1,900 m elevation SE of Dolomieu and Bory craters and the
central cone (at the point labeled 1, figure 1). Discharges continued
for 10 hours. Tremor ceased early the next day.



The 30-31 March eruption included lava fountains up to 50 m in height
feeding voluminous lava flows. This event was the debut of a new phase
of volcanism that presaged the Dolomieu caldera collapse seen in
April.



Collapse. A new eruptive phase began 2 April, venting at ~ 600 m
elevation ESE of the central cone (at point 2, figure 1). The venting
took place along a NW-trending, 1-km-long fissure.



During the next few days, seismicity rates rose to ~ 3-fold larger
than in the previous (26 February) episode. As seismicity grew on 5
April, the permanent GPS instrument SNEG situated just NE of Bory
crater's rim (figure 1) started to displace inward. The vertical
component of motion began with a jolt around noon and markedly
progressed during 1900-2300. Next, at 0048 the next day, an Md 3.2
earthquake occurred below the summit (Bory) crater. After that
earthquake, seismic station Takamaka (Tkr, figure 1) registered a
signal increase of ~ 50%. Coincident with the earthquake, the GPS
instrument displaced ~ 15 cm outward. What followed was a series of
cyclic deformation events, episodes composed of displacements
progressively inward followed by ones sharply outward.



The displacements linked closely to a series of cyclical seismic and
tremor episodes. Each of those consisted of a sharp, post collapse
tremor increase, followed by intervals of stable tremor. Many of these
initial tremor cycles occurred on roughly two-hour intervals (through
the first hours of 6 April), but gradually (with approach to dawn on 6
April) these cycles occurred at about half-hour intervals. On 6 April
there occurred a paroxysmal phase during which 200 m high lava
fountains vented.



Tremor descended to initial levels before the paroxysmal phase, but
cyclical seismic signals remained until 0100 on 7 April. Venting
continued until 1 May, accompanied then by fluctuating tremor.



Estimating the volume of lava emitted was complicated by abundant lava
having entered the sea at the coast, where it built a large platform,
but based on topography and bathymetry before and after the event, the
authors' rough estimate, in millions of cubic meters, was ~ 100-140.
This makes this one of the most voluminous eruptions at this volcano
during the 20th and 21st centuries (figure 2).



Figure 2. Lava flows at Piton del la Fournaise during the eruption of
6 April 2007. Courtesy of OVPF.



Collapse morphology and structure. The first summit zone observations
on the afternoon of the 6th (~ 16 hours after the beginning of the
seismic cycles) revealed that the previous geophysical observations
and intense eruptions coincided with caldera collapse (figure 3). The
6 April collapse affected the Dolomieu's N part, descending the zone
shaded in figure 3 (b) along sub-vertical scarps to the E, N, and W,
with a net offset of 200-300 m. The pre-existing floor remained intact
on the E and S, forming arc-shaped plateaus there.



Figure 3. Piton de la Fournaise's Dolomieu caldera depicted in sketch
maps both prior to the April 2007 eruption and at two stages during
the eruption. The first part (a) represents 31 October 2006. The arrow
indicates a fracture network (Carter and others, 2007). After Michon
and others (2007).



On 10 April the caldera had enlarged to engulf most of the Dolomieu
structure. It had deepened to a maximum offset (determined from
triangulation and confirmed with ASTER stereo images) of 320 to 340 m.
Perched plateaus were restricted to the indicated zones. Subsequent
morphologic changes were minor. The post-collapse caldera had
diameters of 800 x 1,100 m and encompassed 82 x 10^4 m^2, an area 11%
larger than it was prior to the April eruptions.



The authors estimated that the post-collapse caldera's downward
movement displaced a volume of 100-120 million cubic meters. This
displacement was comparable to their estimated volume of emitted lava
(~ 100-140 million cubic meters). The initial stage of collapse (seen
6 April; figure 3b) accounted for ~ 80% of the total volume displaced
in the offset.



The April collapse may have followed pre-existing arcuate faults. It
may also have described a magma chamber, the size and location of
which were recently determined from a GPS inversion (Peltier and
others, 2007). That study suggested a shallow chamber with diameters
of 1.4 km and 1.0 km in the respective E-W and N-S directions.



References: Kaneko, T., Yasuda, A., Shimano, T., Nakada, S., and
Fujii, T., 2005, Submarine flank eruption preceding caldera subsidence
during the 2000 eruption of Miyakejima Volcano, Japan: Bull.
Volcanol., v. 67, p. 243-253, doi: 10.1007/s00445-004-0407-1.



Michon, L., Staudacher, T., Ferrazzini, V., Bachelery, P., and Marti,
J., 2007, April 2007 collapse of Piton de la Fournaise: A new example
of caldera formation: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 34, p. L21301,
doi:10.1029/2007GL031248,2007.



Peltier, A., Staudacher, T., and Bachelery, P., 2007, Constraints on
magma transfers and structures involved in the 2003 actity at Piton de
La Fournaise from displacement data: J. Geophys. Res., v. 112, p.
B03207, doi: 10.1029/2006JB004379.



Simkin, T., and Howard, K. A., 1970, Caldera collapse in Galapagos
Islands, 1968: Science, v. 169, p. 429-437.



Geologic Summary. The massive Piton de la Fournaise basaltic shield
volcano on the French island of Reunion in the western Indian Ocean is
one of the world's most active volcanoes. Much of its >530,000 year
history overlapped with eruptions of the deeply dissected Piton des
Neiges shield volcano to the NW. Three calderas formed at about
250,000, 65,000, and less than 5000 years ago by progressive eastward
slumping of the volcano. Numerous pyroclastic cones dot the floor of
the calderas and their outer flanks. Most historical eruptions have
originated from the summit and flanks of Dolomieu, a 400-m-high lava
shield that has grown within the youngest caldera, which is 8 km wide
and breached to below sea level on the eastern side. More than 150
eruptions, most of which have produced fluid basaltic lava flows, have
occurred since the 17th century. Only six eruptions, in 1708, 1774,
1776, 1800, 1977, and 1986, have originated from fissures on the outer
flanks of the caldera. The Piton de la Fournaise Volcano Observatory,
one of several operated by the Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris,
monitors this very active volcano.



Information Contacts: Laurent Michon and Patrick Bachelery,
Laboratoire GeoSciences Reunion, Institut de Physique du Globe de
Paris, Universite de La Reunion, CNRS, UMR 7154-Geologie des Systemes
Volcaniques, La Reunion, France; Thomas Staudacher and Valerie
Ferrazzini, Observatoire Volcanologique du Piton de la Fournaise,
Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, 14 route nationale 3, 27 eme
km, 97418 La Plaine des Cafres, La Reunion, France (URL:
http://ovpf.univ-reunion.fr/); Joan Marti, Institute of Earth Sciences
"Jaume Almera," Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas,
Barcelona, Spain.





Batu Tara

Lesser Sunda Islands, Indonesia

7.792 S, 123.579 E; summit elev. 748 m

All times are local (= UTC + 8 hours)



On 1 July 2006 a pilot reported an ash cloud from Batu Tara drifting
NW at 1.5 km altitude, but the Darwin VAAC could not identify ash in
MTSAT satellite imagery around the same time. No other evidence or
reports could confirm a renewal of activity at this small uninhabited
island volcano, which last erupted during 1847-1852. Starting in
January 2007, there were satellite thermal anomalies suggesting an
eruption. Two months later observers issued reports of ash plumes from
explosive activity.



MODIS infrared satellite data, compiled and analyzed by the Hawai'i
Institute of Geophysics and Planetology (HIGP) Thermal Alerts System,
first showed anomalies at Batu Tara on 17 January 2007. For almost a
year thermal signatures typically were detected every 1-3 days,
sometimes every 4-5 days, with rare gaps of 6-7 days. After no
anomalies during 9-17 January 2008, regular hotspots returned and were
continuing at the end of the month.



The Darwin VAAC reported that an ash cloud seen in MTSAT and Terra
MODIS imagery at 1633 on 13 March 2007 reached an altitude of 4.3 km
and drifted N. By 0833 on 14 March the plume was seen extending about
90 km NE, after which it dissipated. Later that day the low-level
plume was 55 km long towards the ENE.



A continuous low-level plume, at or below summit level, was observed
on imagery on 15 March extending SE from the summit to a distance of
65 km. The plume later shifted around towards the E, to a distance of
~ 37 km, on 16 March. Imagery on 17 March showed another direction
change, to the NE, extending a maximum of 74 km. Government officials,
residents, and fishermen on Lembata Island (formerly known as
Lomblen), ~ 50 km S, observed plumes rising from Batu Tara during
17-19 March, but there was no night glow. The plumes on 19 March were
reportedly 500-1,500 m high and blowing E. Although meteorological
clouds interfered with satellite observations, the Centre of
Volcanology and Geological Hazard Mitigation (CVGHM) reported
continuous eruptions with ash to 500 m above the summit on 20 March. A
continuous thin plume was also seen on satellite imagery extending 37
km NE on 20 March. Similar activity continued through 21-22 March,
with low-level plumes identified in imagery out to distances of 46-56
km towards the E and SE.



High waves on 22 March prevented a science team from landing on the
island, where CVGHM had hoped to install instruments that could be
monitored from the observation post at Lewotolo volcano, ~ 52 km SSW.
Observations on 22 March described ash plumes from the summit crater
rising as high as 2 km and ashfall killing trees within a 500-m radius
of the summit on the southern and eastern slopes. White emissions with
intermittent dense gray plumes also originated from a location on the
E foot of the mountain, with the clouds rising up to 250 m. A small
cone grew there with a crater diameter of ~ 10 m. From a vantage point
on Lembata, other observers reported minor ashfall, smelled sulfur
odors, heard explosion noises, and saw incandescent blocks ejected to
heights of ~ 500 m that landed in the sea.



Meteorological clouds continued to intermittently obscure satellite
observations during 23-30 March, but available clear imagery and CVGHM
reports indicated continuing plumes at low altitudes extending as far
as 90 km downwind (figures 4 and 5). Infrared anomalies also continued
to be recorded during this time. On the morning of 31 March a plume
was seen extending about 150 km NNW.



Figure 4. Aerial photograph of Batu Tara erupting in late March 2007
with an ash plume blowing NE. View is towards the SSE from a Garuda
Boeing 737 flight between Timika, Papua New Guinea and Bali,
Indonesia. Lembata Island is in the right background. Courtesy of
Michael Thirnbeck.



Figure 5. Aerial photograph of Batu Tara erupting in late March 2007
showing a steam plume and a smaller ash puff. View is towards the SE
from a Garuda Boeing 737 flight between Timika, Papua New Guinea and
Bali, Indonesia. The bay on the left opens to the E. Courtesy of
Michael Thirnbeck.



CVGHM reported observations from 30 March that indicated the E side of
the volcano had been most impacted by recent activity. Plant life on
the E side was affected by hot ashfall. White plumes rose from the
summit to an altitude of ~ 1.7 km and drifted E. Incandescent
rockslides and cooled lava flows were observed at the E foot of the
volcano. Steam and occasional ash plumes rose from the area where hot
material interacted with the sea.



Semi-continuous eruptions through 3 April produced low-level plumes,
generally to altitudes of 1.5-3 km, reported by ground observers and
seen in satellite imagery to distance of 37-56 km downwind in various
directions. On 5 April, plumes rose to 3 km altitude. Based on
satellite imagery the CVGHM reported that on 5 April a lava flow on
the E slope created a central levee with debris fans on either side.
The delta-like shape spanned about 450 m across. A lava flow also
extended 100 m into the water. Diffuse plumes seen in satellite
imagery rose to altitudes of 1.5 km and drifted W and NW during 4-11
April. Explosive activity producing noticeable ash plumes generally
declined in April, and on the 12th the hazard status was lowered to
Alert Level 2. However, hotspots continued to be recorded on an almost
daily basis.



A pilot reported a low-level ash plume extending 90 km W on 27 April,
but ash could not be identified in satellite data. Based on satellite
imagery and CVGHM, the Darwin VAAC issued reports of diffuse low ash
plumes drifting W during 5 and 10-12 May. On 19 June an ash plume rose
to an altitude of 1.7 km. Clouds inhibited visual observations on the
other days during 18-25 June. However, on 19 June, a dense white plume
rising to 1,000 m high was observed. Between 28 June and 1 July,
diffuse white plume was observed rising to 50-150 m. An ash column
reached 750 m above the summit.



Based on observations of satellite imagery, the Darwin VAAC reported
that on 18 September, diffuse ash plumes rose to an altitude of 2.4 km
and drifted W for 140 km. CVGHM lowered the Alert Level to 1 on 9
October. During 3 September-9 October, plumes rose to an altitude of
approximately 1.4 km, 700 m above the summit. Satellite imagery showed
an ash plume on 13 October that rose to an altitude of 3 km and
drifted N and W. Despite time gaps when plumes were not seen and the
decreased frequency of explosion plumes, MODIS data recorded thermal
anomalies at least every few days throughout April-October 2007, and
continuing into February 2008.



Geologic Summary. The small isolated island of Batu Tara in the Flores
Sea about 50 km N of Lembata (formerly Lomblen) Island contains a
scarp on the eastern side similar to the Sciara del Fuoco of Italy's
Stromboli volcano. Vegetation covers the flanks of Batu Tara to within
50 m of the 748-m-high summit. Batu Tara lies N of the main volcanic
arc and is noted for its potassic leucite-bearing basanitic and
tephritic rocks. The first historical eruption from Batu Tara, during
1847-52, produced explosions and a lava flow.



Information Contacts: Centre of Volcanology and Geological Hazard
Mitigation (CVGHM), Diponegoro 57, Bandung, Jawa Barat 40122,
Indonesia (URL: http://portal.vsi.esdm.go.id/joomla/); Darwin Volcanic
Ash Advisory Centre (VAAC), Bureau of Meteorology, Northern Territory
Regional Office, PO Box 40050, Casuarina, Northern Territory 0811,
Australia (Email: darwin.vaac@xxxxxxxxxx; URL:
http://www.bom.gov.au/info/ vaac/); Michael Thirnbeck, Jakarta,
Indonesia (http://www.flickr.com/photos/thirnbeck/); Hawai'i Institute
of Geophysics and Planetology (HIGP) Thermal Alerts System, School of
Ocean and Earth Science and Technology (SOEST), Univ. of Hawai'i, 2525
Correa Road, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA (URL:
http://hotspot.higp.hawaii.edu/).





Anatahan

Mariana Islands, Central Pacific

16.35 N, 145.67 E; summit elev. 790 m

All times are local (= UTC + 10 hours)



During mid 2007 and into early February 2008, Anatahan (figure 6)
discharged occasional significant plumes, as restless seismicity
associated with intermittent eruptions continued. Key source data for
this report came from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the Emergency
Management Office of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
(EMO), NASA Earth Observatory, and the Washington Volcanic Ash
Advisory Center (VAAC).



Figure 6. Satellite image of Anatahan in early 2008. Bright white
areas are clouds. A diffuse plume dirfting NW appears to be
originating from fumaroles in the eastern crater. Courtesy of Google
Earth and Digital Globe, accessed 20 February 2008.



The same day MODIS acquired this image, the U.S. Air Force Weather
Agency reported an odor of sulfur on the island of Guam, ~ 200 km SW
of Saipan, which also suggests the presence of vog. USGS and EMO air
quality instruments on Saipan recorded a maximum 5-minute average of
959 ppb sulfur dioxide (SO2) and 99 ppb hydrogen sulfide (H2S) on 18
March. Although such plumes can cause closure of the Saipan airport
and result in health risks to Saipan residents, such problems were not
mentioned in reports of this incident.



Crater lake disappears. Seismicity remained restless and intermittent
plumes continued to discharge from Anatahan during late 2007 and into
2008. By 31 January 2008 the crater lake had disappeared.



Distinct increases in amplitude of seismic tremors occurred on 26 and
28 November 2007. Explosions were also observed, with rates peaking on
28 November at several per minute. This increase prompted raising the
alert level to Yellow/Advisory on 29 November.



On 14 December 2007 the Washington Volcanic Ash Advisory Center (VAAC)
reported a steam plume visible in satellite data, but no indication of
ash. There was a small surge in seismic activity recorded on 16
December that decreased to previous levels by the following day.
According to the U.S. Air Force Weather Agency, a plume on 30 December
consisted primarily of steam and gas, with little ash content. Seismic
tremor levels increased 16 January 2008 and persisted.



On 31 January 2008, satellite data showed that the lake in the E
crater, a water body whose level had been dropping since September
2007, had disappeared. According to the USGS, the tremor indicated
that the volcano may have entered a new phase within its current
episode of unrest, and the disappearance of the lake suggested that
the magmatic heat source may have moved closer to the surface.



Ash emissions occurred at Anatahan on 3 February 2008. Satellite
images showed a diffuse ash plume extending W for ~ 100 km. It was not
possible to determine precisely the altitude of this ash plume from
the currently available data, but it was likely less than 1,500 m. On
5 February, the USGS reported persistent elevated seismic tremor and
continued detection of SO2 in satellite data. The USGS changed the
Aviation Color Code to Orange and the Alert Level to Watch as a result
of the ash emissions.



A satellite image (figure 7) shows the volcanic island on 6 February
2008. Dwarfed by clouds overhead, the island released a faint plume
(presumably bearing little if any ash) blowing WNW. Data from the
satellite-based Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) showed a low-level
SO2 plume extending W to SW from the volcano.



Figure 7. Anatahan released plumes of ash and steam in early February
2008, continuing a pattern of intermittent activity from the previous
December. The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on
NASA's Aqua satellite captured this image on 6 February 2008. In this
image, a diffuse pale gray plume blows W from the volcanic island and
over the Pacific Ocean. NASA image courtesy the MODIS Rapid Response
Team at NASA GSFC.



No thermal anomalies have been measured by MODIS satellites over
Anataham since June 2006. In a recent publication, Hilton and others
(2007) reported on newly derived SO2 emission rates for Anatahan.



Reference: Hilton, D. R., Fischer, T. P., McGonigle, A. J. S., and de
Moor, J. M., 2007, Variable SO2 emission rates for Anatahan volcano,
the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands: Implications for
deriving arc-wide volatile fluxes from erupting volcanoes: Geophysical
Research Letters, v. 34, p. L14315, doi:10.1029/2007GL030405.



Geologic Summary. The elongate, 9-km-long island of Anatahan in the
central Mariana Islands consists of a large stratovolcano with a 2.3 x
5 km, E-W-trending compound summit caldera. The larger western portion
of the caldera is 2.3 x 3 km wide, and its western rim forms the
island's 790-m high point. Ponded lava flows overlain by pyroclastic
deposits fill the floor of the western caldera, whose SW side is cut
by a fresh-looking smaller crater. The 2-km-wide eastern portion of
the caldera contained a steep-walled inner crater whose floor prior to
the 2003 eruption was only 68 m above sea level. A submarine volcano,
NE Anatahan, rises to within 460 m of the sea surface on the NE flank
of the volcano, and numerous other submarine vents are found on the
NE-to-SE flanks. Sparseness of vegetation on the most recent lava
flows on Anatahan had indicated that they were of Holocene age, but
the first historical eruption of Anatahan did not occur until May
2003, when a large explosive eruption took place forming a new crater
inside the eastern caldera.



Information Contacts: Emergency Management Office of the Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands (EMO-CNMI) and USGS Hawaii Volcano
Observatory, PO Box 100007, Saipan, MP 96950, USA (URL:
http://www.cnmiemo.gov.mp/ and
http://volcano.wr.usgs.gov/cnmistatus.php); U.S. Air Force Weather
Agency (AFWA)/XOGM, Offutt Air Force Base, NE 68113, USA (Email:
Charles.Holliday@xxxxxxxxxxx); NASA Earth Observatory (URL:
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/); Washington Volcanic Ash Advisory
Center (VAAC), Satellite Analysis Branch (SAB), NOAA/NESDIS E/SP23,
NOAA Science Center Room 401, 5200 Auth Rd., Camp Springs, MD 20746,
USA (URL: http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/); Google Earth (URL:
http://earth.google.com/).





Bezymianny

Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia

55.978 N, 160.587 E; summit elev. 2,882 m



In BGVN 32:11, we erroneously reported a cloud height of 35 km from
Bezymianny on 10 November 2007. The plume on that day was a steam
plume that extended ~35 km downwind.



Reference: Cergey Ushakov, Kamchatkan and Northern Kuriles Volcanic
Activity, KVERT INFORMATION RELEASE 57-07, Saturday, November 10,
2007, 03:30 UTC (15:30 KDT).



El Chichon

Mexico

17.360 N, 93.228 W; summit elev. 1,050 m

All times are local (= UTC - 6 hours)



On 4 November 2007, at midnight, a landslide along the Grijalva river
buried a settlement (Juan de Grijalva, Municipio de Ostuacan, Chiapas)
located ~ 25 km WSW from the 1982 crater. The event, the subject of a
report in the newspaper La Jornada, was reported to have buried 40-60
dwellings and killed at least 10, but more likely 200-300 residents.



Concern arose as to whether the event was triggered by El Chichon
volcano. The scientists authoring this report, which included those
from the Instituto de Geofisica of the Universidad Nacional Autonoma
de Mexico (UNAM), noted that low-frequency rumbling (presumably
tremor) can clearly be felt inside the active crater. They associated
these perturbations with the hydrothermal system.



The authors considered the perturbations too small to cause the
distant landslide. According to the authors, the landslide at the
Grijalva river was probably the result of morphological instability
after heavy rainfall, rather than associated with El Chichon behavior.



However, in the aftermath of the 1982 eruption, El Chichon's nearby
flanks still contain abundant unstable slopes, and the new vegetation
fails to keep up with the erosion rate. Also, intracrater avalanches
still occur, particularly after heavy rainfall. According to co-author
Dmitri Rouwet, the rumbling beneath the crater often triggers small
intracrater avalanches.



El Chichon was the scene of large Plinian eruptions in 1982, and the
crater hosts a shallow crater lake that has drastically varied in size
since January 2001. Figure 8 shows the lake in 2005, the smallest
volume at this crater lake yet observed. In March 2007 (figure 9) the
lake contained the largest volume yet observed (~ 6 x 10^5 m^3).



Figure 8. The crater lake at El Chichon when it contained the smallest
water volume ever recorded here (5 June 2005). The crater diameter is
~ 1 km. Courtesy of L. Rosales.



Figure 9. The crater lake at El Chichon when it contained the largest
water volume ever recorded here (26 March 2007). Courtesy M. Jutzeler.



Boiling springs. The changes in lake volume stem largely from variable
discharges at a boiling spring, rather than merely reflecting direct
input from rainfall and evaporation.



During 2001, 2004 and 2007 a large-volume lake was associated with a
high discharge (over 10 kg/s) into the lake. Saline, near-neutral pH
water pours from a boiling geyser-like spring on the lake's N coast.
This took place in months such as January, only a few months after the
end of the June-October rainy season. The salinity was greater when
the lake had higher volume. This observation implies that the direct
input of rainwater is not a major contributor to lake volume. Instead,
rainwater is thought to infiltrate into the crater floor and then
discharge into the lake through the boiling springs.



These springs alternate between periods of high- and low-water
discharge feeding the lake. The periods of high discharge at the
springs correspond to periods when the lake grows. The periods of low
discharge at the springs correspond to vapor discharge there,
intervals when the lake shrinks.



In general, ongoing measurements suggest decreasing concentrations for
the boiling spring and crater lake waters with time. This suggest an
absence of new magmatic input since 1982. After the 2007 rainy season
the lake volume decreased, coinciding with a change to pure vapor
emission from the geyser-like spring since August 2007 (figure 10).



Figure 10. The crater lake at El Chichon crater lake as seen on 20
December 2007. Courtesy A. Mazot.

Tremor, gas fluxes, inferences, and ongoing monitoring. The authors of
this report inferred that the low-frequency tremor and rumbling
beneath the crater floor stemmed from fluid migrations inside the
boiling aquifer, sometimes causing small intra-aquifer phreatic
explosions. Nevertheless, crater floor inspection during December 2007
found it unbroken (without evidence of rupture or breaching). The
crater morphology, notably the distribution of fumarolic fields, has
on the whole remained stable since shortly after the 1982 eruptions.



The CO2 gas fluxes from the crater lake's surface and floor were
recently sampled using a floating accumulation chamber to measure the
output. The calculated mean emission rate at the lake's surface in
March 2007 was 1,500 g / (m^2 ⋅ day), and in December 2007 a
preliminary estimate was 860 g / (m^2 ⋅ day). A preliminary flux rate
from the crater floor in October 2007 was 1,930 g / (m^2 ⋅ day).



In addition, infrared camera images proved useful to quantify the
thermal output. A good correlation appeared between gas flux and
ground temperature. This may offer potential for future monitoring.



The authors inferred that future El Chichon volcanism might take the
form of intracrater dome growth. Such growth could follow changes in
chemistry, temperature and dynamics of the crater lake, the degassing
regime, seismicity, geomagnetism, crater morphology, or other unrest
such as the onset of phreatic explosions. Such processes can occur
very rapidly, as recently shown by the dome growth at Kelud,
Indonesia, in November 2007. However, the authors' investigation found
no evidence to support current dome growth.



Future updates on the activity of El Chichon can be found on the
CVL-IAVCEI website (http://www.ulb.ac.be/sciences/cvl/index.html).



Geologic Summary. El Chichon is a small, but powerful trachyandesitic
tuff cone and lava dome complex that occupies an isolated part of the
Chiapas region in SE Mexico far from other Holocene volcanoes. Prior
to 1982, this relatively unknown volcano was heavily forested and of
no greater height than adjacent non-volcanic peaks. The largest dome,
the former summit of the volcano, was constructed within a 1.6 x 2 km
summit crater created about 220,000 years ago. Two other large domes
are located on the SW and NW flanks. A horse-shoe shaped explosion
crater on the SE flank of El Chichon witnesses past explosive
activity, now hosting the Agua Caliente thermal springs. Eleven large
explosive eruptions have occurred during the last 8,000 years. The
powerful 1982 explosive eruptions of high-sulfur, anhydrite-bearing
magma destroyed the summit lava dome and were accompanied by
pyroclastic flows and surges that devastated an area extending about 8
km around the volcano. The eruptions created a new 1-km-wide,
300-m-deep crater that now contains an acidic crater lake.



Information Contacts: Dmitri Rouwet, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e
Vulcanologia (INGV-Palermo), Sezione di Palermo, Via Ugo La Malfa 153,
CAP 90146, Palermo, Italy (URL: http://www.pa.ingv.it/); Agnes Mazot,
Loic Peiffer, and Yuri Taran, Instituto de Geofisica, Universidad
Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Ciudad Universitaria, Circuito Exterior
s/n, Col. Copilco, Del. Coyoacan, CP 04510, Mexico DF, Mexico (URL:
http://www.geofisica.unam.mx/vulcanologia/spanish/personal.html); Nick
Varley, Centre of Exchange and Research in Volcanology, Faculty of
Science, University of Colima, Av. 25 de Julio #965, Col. Villas San
Sebastian, C.P. 28045 Colima, Colima, Mexico (URL:
http://www.ucol.mx/ciiv/nick/personal_en.htm); Martin Jutzeler, Centre
for Ore Deposit Research (CODES), University of Tasmania, Australia;
and Laura Rosales Lagarde, Earth and Environmental Science Department,
New Mexico Tech, Socorro, NM, USA; La Jornada (URL:
www.jornada.unam.mx/).





Fuego

Guatemala

14.473 N, 90.880 W; summit elev. 3,763 m

All times are local (= UTC - 6 hours)



Eruptive activity has continued at Fuego between January 2007 and
early February 2008. Typical activity during this interval consisted
of explosions that generated ash plumes up to ~ 2 km above the summit
(~ 6 km altitude) and caused local ashfall (reported up to ~ 15 km
away, but from one eruption, ~ 25 km away). Strombolian eruptions,
avalanches, and lava flows up to ~ 1.5 km long were also commonly
reported. Pyroclastic flows traveled up to ~ 2 km. Blocks detaching
from the front of the flows and bouncing downslope were often
incandescent. Satellite imagery often detected hotspots. Shock waves
and rumbling or loud noises, sometimes described as similar to a
passing airplane, were commonly noticed. Out last report discussed
events through December 2006 (BGVN 32:11).



Details included in the text below were provided by the Instituto
Nacional de Sismologia, Vulcanologia, Meteorologia e Hidrologia
(INSIVUMEH), the Coordinadora Nacional para la Reduccion de Desastres
(CONRED), and the Washington Volcanic Ash Advisory Center (VAAC).



The photographs included in this report are by Richard Roscoe, who on
his website (www.photovolcanica.com) features more Fuego photos than
we can include here. He also includes a brief animation of a small
Fuego eruption. His site also provides a beginner's guide to volcano
photography as well as cautions about safety and trekking in the area.
All of his photos are used with his permission. They were taken during
29-31 December 2007. A companion site by his colleagues M. Rietze and
Th. Boeckel also describes their photo excursion. Figures 11-13 are
broadly representative of the kinds of eruptions common at Fuego
during the reporting interval, and they provide a feel for the
regional setting and geography.



Figure 11. A view of Fuego in eruption as seen from the city of
Antigua. Note twin church spires along the photo's lower margin. Fuego
(erupting at left) is only one of several volcanoes in this photo;
progressively farther towards the right peaks consist of Meseta,
Acatenango (highest), and Yepocapa. This copyrighted photo is from
around 29-31 December 2007. Used with permission of photographer
Richard Roscoe.



Figure 12. An explosive plume rising vertically above Fuego's summit
on 29 December 2007, with wisps of falling ash visible on the right
side. The photo was taken from Antigua. Copyrighted photo by Richard
Roscoe.



Figure 13. Incandescent ejecta from Strombolian eruptions of Fuego
taken from the N on Acatenango volcano (~ 4 km elevation). The exact
date was surmised from text as 30 December 2007. The shape of Fuego's
summit has been modified by the growth of a sharp peak, presumably due
to the accumulation of spatter and cinder. The night-time exposure
also captured in the background the lights of towns on the Pacific
coastal plain to the S. Copyrighted photo by Richard Roscoe.



During 4-5 January 2007 gas-and-ash clouds rose to 4.2-4.8 km altitude
and constant incandescent avalanches from the central crater and a
lateral crater ~ 70 m from the S edge of the central crater descended
SW towards Taniluya ravine. Fine ashfall was noted in areas S and ~
9-15 km SW of the summit. On 12 January there was explosive ejecta and
ash plumes up to 4 km altitude. Incandescent material was propelled up
to 75 m above the summit and incandescent blocks rolled W towards
Taniluya ravine and Santa Teresa ravine, and S towards Cenizas ravine.
Explosive activity was reported again during 21-29 January when
incandescent material and blocks were ejected 100 m above the summit;
blocks rolled ~ 500 m S and SW. On 26 and 29 January glowing blocks
from lava-flow fronts rolled S towards Cenizas ravine. During an
overnight visit to a neighboring summit, Craig Chesner and Sid Halsor
saw Strombolian eruptions at roughly half-hour intervals.



No activity was reported after late January until 9-13 March 2007,
when lava flows were noted extending ~ 100-150 m W toward Taniluya
ravine and explosive ash plumes rose to 4-4.2 km altitude. On 12 March
glowing material was ejected ~ 15-20 m above the central crater. Lava
flows on 15 March and explosive incandescent ejecta thrown 200 m above
crater rim were accompanied by an ash plume. The longest lava flows
traveled ~ 1.5 km W toward Taniluya ravine. Similar activity continued
the next day, with previous lava flows advancing and new flows seen in
different ravines. Pyroclastic flows also occurred, ash plumes rose to
4-6 km altitude. Shockwaves were felt ~ 15 km away, and Strombolian
eruptions propelled glowing tephra 300 m above the summit. Two
pyroclastic flows traveled about 800 m; one NW, and another W and SW.
During most days 21-27 March Fuego emitted explosive gas-and-ash
plumes that rose to ~ 4.7-5.1 km altitude, causing ashfall in areas
5-8 km SSE and 9 km W. On 24 March explosions were followed by lava
blocks rolling down the W flank toward Taniluya ravine. Similar
activity on 26 March caused ashfall in areas 10-25 km to the W and SE.



The next reports of activity, during 20-23 April, were of lava flows,
pyroclastic flows, explosive incandescent ejecta 50-75 m above the
vent, and a gas-and-ash plume up to 4 km altitude. Incandescent
material descended 300 m down the S and W flanks. The Washington VAAC
reported that an intense hotspot seen on satellite imagery on 21 April
was likely caused by a lava flow to the SW. On 23 April a pyroclastic
flow and incandescent avalanches traveled down SE and SW ravines; ash
explosions caused light ashfall in areas S.



Observations during 17-19 May were of fumarolic emissions ~ 600 m high
along with active lava flows extending ~ 100 m SW toward the Taniluya
ravine and ~ 500 m SW toward the Cenizas ravine. The lava flow from
the edge of the central crater continued on the S flank (~ 150 m
long); landslides of blocks of incandescent material spalled from the
front of the flow into the Taniluya ravine. Activity the following
week, 26-27 May, consisted of explosive ejecta ~ 100 m above vent,
gray steam-and-ash plumes up to 4-4.6 km altitude, and block
avalanches to the S and SW. On 28 May the lava flow on the S flank
continued to advance and produce incandescent blocks that rolled W in
Taniluya ravine. Explosive incandescent ejecta was seen on 29 May,
along with lava flows that extended ~ 400 m SW toward Cenizas ravine
and incandescent material rising tens of meters above the vent.



On 1-2 August, pyroclastic flows occurred and explosive ejecta was
thrown 50-75 m above the crater rim; an ash plume rose to 5.3 km
altitude. Incandescent avalanches traveled 500-700 m down the S and W
flanks. On 2 August, a moderate eruption produced a pyroclastic flow
that traveled ~ 2 km SSW down the Cenizas ravine. A resultant plume
produced ashfall S, SW, and W for several minutes.



On 8-9 August, pyroclastic flows and explosive Strombolian activity
occurred with a gas-and-ash cloud to 4.4-5.6 km altitude. This
eruption was visible from the city of Antigua, even though the
resulting lava flows primarily traveled down the S and W flanks, which
were on the side opposite from Antigua. Clouds obscured the view of
possible E-flank lava flows. Ashfall was reported in areas to the W.
Lava flows and related detached blocks traveled 1.5 km down Cenizas
ravine to the SW. Several pyroclastic flows descended the flanks.
Ashfall was reported in villages to the W, SW, and S.



On 10-13 August, small explosions and ash plumes rose up to 4.3 km
altitude. 11 August behavior was characterized by weak explosions that
expelled gray ash to 500 m above the crater. On 27 August, lahars
carried tree trunks, branches, and blocks down the Lajas drainage to
the SE. On 28 August, explosive ash plumes rose to 4.1 km altitude. On
31 August, a lahar 8 m wide and 1.5 m thick descended W down the Santa
Teresa ravine.



On 3-4 September, explosive ash plumes rose to 4.5 km altitude. On 3
September, fumarolic plumes rose to 4 km altitude and a 300 m lava
flow traveled W down the Taniluya drainage. There were also avalanches
in the Cenizas ravine. On 21 September explosions of gray ash rose to
~ 5.8 km altitude and incandescent pulses in the crater rose to 75 m
with avalanches in the S and SW flank. On 24 September 2007, moderate
and strong explosions occurred, accompanied by ash plumes extending up
to 900 m above the crater, and constant degassing sounds for periods
of up to 20 min. On 5 October, weak to moderate incandescent
explosions occurred, accompanied by ash plumes up to 800 m above the
crater, and degassing sounds. Block avalanches were noted in the
Taniluya and Santa Teresa ravines.



On 10 October, weak to moderate explosions occurred, the largest
accompanied by ash plumes that rose to 4-5 km altitude. Avalanches
from cone building in the inner crater went W into the Taniluya and
Santa Teresa ravines.



On 12 October, INSIVUMEH reported that explosions from Fuego produced
ash plumes that rose to altitudes of 4.2-4.8 km and caused ashfall in
areas to the W. The explosions were accompanied by rumbling, and
degassing sounds; shock waves were detected up to15 km away. The
Washington VAAC reported a thermal anomaly on satellite imagery along
with ash plumes that drifted W and NW.



According to Washington VAAC, satellite imagery detected multiple ash
"puffs" emitting from the volcano between 24-30 October. They also
reported ash plumes on 20 November (4.6 km in altitude) and 29
November. Additional weak to moderate explosions occurred on 7
December and 12 December, expelling ash and causing degassing sounds.
Shock waves were noticed up to 15 km away.



On 15 December, Fuego generated a significant ash-and-steam plume that
was observed from Antigua and Guatemala. It also produced a
considerable flow of ash (and possibly lava) down its E slopes.
According to the Washington VAAC, satellite imagery detected a thermal
anomaly on 15-16 December. Thereafter, Fuego's activity declined to
normal levels, although a few moderate explosions continued, along
with an occasional ash plume. An ash cloud from Fuego was observed on
21 December and 26 December 2007.

For 11 January and 24 January 2008, INSIVUMEH reported weak explosions
from Fuego that produced ash plumes that rose to altitudes of 4-5 km.
Small avalanches of blocks traveled W toward the Taniluya ravine.
Based on reports from INSIVUMEH, CONRED reported on 28 January that
the Alert Level was lowered to Green. On 30 January, satellite imagery
detected a narrow plumes of gas and possible ash. On 4 February,
satellite imagery detected ash plumes that rose to an altitude of 5
km.



Geologic Summary. Volcan Fuego, one of Central America's most active
volcanoes, is one of three large stratovolcanoes overlooking
Guatemala's former capital, Antigua. The scarp of an older edifice,
Meseta, lies between 3,763-m-high Fuego and its twin volcano to the N,
Acatenango. Construction of Meseta volcano dates back to about 230,000
years and continued until the late Pleistocene or early Holocene.
Collapse of Meseta volcano may have produced the massive Escuintla
debris-avalanche deposit, which extends about 50 km onto the Pacific
coastal plain. Growth of the modern Fuego volcano followed, continuing
the Sward migration of volcanism that began at Acatenango. In contrast
to the mostly andesitic Acatenango volcano, eruptions at Fuego have
become more mafic with time, and most historical activity has produced
basaltic rocks. Frequent vigorous historical eruptions have been
recorded at Fuego since the onset of the Spanish era in 1524, and have
produced major ashfalls, along with occasional pyroclastic flows and
lava flows.



Information Contacts: Instituto Nacional de Sismologia, Vulcanologia,
Meteorologia e Hidrologia (INSIVUMEH), Ministero de Communicaciones,
Transporto, Obras Publicas y Vivienda, 7a. Av. 14-57, zona 13,
Guatemala City 01013, Guatemala (URL: http://www.insivumeh.pagina.de);
Coordinadora Nacional para la Reduccion de Desastres (CONRED), Av.
Hincapie 21-72, Zona 13, Guatemala City, Guatemala; Washington
Volcanic Ash Advisory Center (VAAC), Satellite Analysis Branch
(NOAA/NESDIS), 4700 Silver Hill Road, Stop 9910, Washington, DC
20233-9910, USA (URL: http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/); Richard Roscoe,
PhotoVolcanica.com (URL: http://www.photovolcanica.com/); M. Rietze,
R. Roscoe, and Th. Boeckel, (website) Volcanoes of Central America,
Volcan Fuego, Guatemala 29th-31st of Dec. 2007 (URL:
http://www.tboeckel.de/EFSF/efsf_wv/fuego_07/fuego_07_e.htm); Craig
Chesner, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, Illinois, USA; Sid
Halsor, Wilkes Barre University, Wilkes Barre, PA 18766, USA.





Poas

Costa Rica

10.20 N, 84.233 W; summit elev. 2,708 m

All times are local (= UTC - 6 hours)



A small phreatic eruption took place from the crater lake at Poas
(figure 14) on 13 January 2008. Various changes such as the loss of
fumaroles and minor mass wasting have also occurred at the intracrater
dome. The 13 January eruption was described in a report by Eliecer
Duarte of the Observatorio Vulcanologico Sismologica de Costa
Rica-Universidad Nacional (OVSICORI-UNA). Our previous report
discussed September 2006-September 2007 and noted hydrothermal
variations and a minor phreatic eruption (BGVN 32:09).



Figure 14. Topographic map of Poas and environs emphasizing the crater
lake, scene of a 13 January phreatic eruption. Note the dome and the
area labeled 'terrace' on its margin. Map by E. Duarte, OVSICORI-UNA.



A small phreatic eruption occurred at 0900 on 13 January from the hot,
acidic Laguna Caliente. Carlos Cordero, a park ranger who witnessed
the event, indicated that the event ejected water and sediments from
the lake's center to a height of ~ 200 m. This material mainly fell
back into the lake, changing its color from a dark green to an intense
white (figure 15). The event was also seen by a group of tourists who
watched from the main viewpoint ~ 1 km S of the lake. The eye-witness
report emphasized the calm conditions of the lake and dome before the
eruption.



Figure 15. A picture of the active crater of Poas taken a short time
after the phreatic eruption had ended and the main column had
collapsed on 13 January 2008. The dome is in front of the
steam-covered lake. The shot was captured by park ranger Carlos
Cordero who stood at the main viewpoint S of the lake. Courtesy of
OVSICORI-UNA.



Post-eruption inspection of the crater by OVSICORI staff revealed that
the explosion left a 1.5-m-wide band of sediment up to 10 cm thick
along the entire rim of the lake (figure 16). Some sediment also
extended about 8 m from the shore at the S rim, near the terrace of
the dome. The deposits, clearly debris from the lake bottom, included
many shining crystals; larger clasts were absent. After the expulsion,
water flowing back into the lake seemingly scoured or removed some
sediment.



Figure 16. A remnant of the dried and solidified sediments expelled
during the 13 January eruption at Poas. The sediments, fine grained
and light in color, appeared to have come directly from the bottom of
the crater lake. Note pocket knife for scale. Courtesy of
OVSICORI-UNA.



During a visit of OVSICORI staff, the lake's color changed over about
a 3-hour period as a result of gas expulsion. The rapid degassing of
thick columns of toxic gases obscured visibility of the other side of
the lake. Compared to measurements at the end of November 2007, the
lake's temperature had dropped (to 45ºC) and the water level had risen
1.5 m.



The OVSICORI's staff also found a small landslide (8 x 20 m) on the
dome's N face (figure 17). They described the landslide as a chaotic
deposit of heavily altered angular blocks in a gray matrix that had
been altered by hydrothermal activity. A slurry of yellowish materials
reached the edge of the lake. Based on field evidence, the team
concluded that the small landslide took place immediately after the
emission of sediments.



Figure17. This 18 January photo of the crater lake, shoreline, and
adjacent dome at Poas, indicates the location of several small areas
where 13 January deposits still remained. In addition, a small portion
of the dome had detached and moved downslope in a minor landslide that
reached the lake. Courtesy of OVSICORI-UNA.



Figure 18 shows a photo of the dome's steep E cliff face. Fumaroles
had recently ceased emerging. Cracks and crevices on top of that
terrace were also rapidly widening as joint blocks detach.



Figure 18. A photo of the E wall of the dome at Poas, a zone of active
slope failure. In this area previously active springs and fumaroles
had recently disappeared leaving only native sulfur deposits at the
mouth of former fumaroles. At the foot of the cliff lies a terrace of
debris from mass wasting. Courtesy of OVSICORI-UNA.



Geologic Summary. The broad, well-vegetated edifice of Poas, one of
the most active volcanoes of Costa Rica, contains three craters along
a N-S line. The frequently visited multi-hued summit crater lakes of
the basaltic-to-dacitic volcano, which is one of Costa Rica's most
prominent natural landmarks, are easily accessible by vehicle from the
nearby capital city of San Jose. A N-S-trending fissure cutting the
2,708-m-high complex stratovolcano extends to the lower northern
flank, where it has produced the Congo stratovolcano and several
lake-filled maars. The southernmost of the two summit crater lakes,
Botos, is cold and clear and last erupted about 7,500 years ago. The
more prominent geothermally heated northern lake, Laguna Caliente, is
one of the world's most acidic natural lakes, with a pH of near zero.
It has been the site of frequent phreatic and phreatomagmatic
eruptions since the first historical eruption was reported in 1828.
Poas eruptions often include geyser-like ejections of crater-lake
water.



Information Contacts: E. Duarte and E. Fernandez, Observatorio
Vulcanologico Sismologica de Costa Rica-Universidad Nacional
(OVSICORI-UNA), Apartado 86-3000, Heredia, Costa Rica (URL:
http://www.ovsicori.una.ac.cr/).





Guagua Pichincha

Ecuador

0.171 S, 78.598 W; summit elev. 4,784 m

All times are local (= UTC - 5 hours)



Following December 2007 seismicity, Guagua Pichincha generated
phreatic eruptions multiple times on 1 February 2008. The summit lies
only ~ 8 km W of the limits of Ecuador's capital, Quito. Our last
report summarized events through January 2004 (BGVN 29:06).



In lead-up to the phreatic eruptions, the Instituto Geofisico Escuela
Politecnica Nacional (IG-EPN), reported that an M 4.1 earthquake
occurred in the vicinity on 6 December 2007, followed a week later by
an increase in fracture earthquakes. These events, continuing through
23 December, were below M 3 and occurred at shallow depths within the
volcano. On 24-30 December 2007, IG-EPN indicated that the fumaroles
were stable.



IG-EPN reported that a slight increase in activity had been observed
over a few weeks at the end of January 2008. This activity culminated
on 1 February with seven phreatic explosions of moderate size. IG-EPN
went on to say that these phreatic eruptions generally occur during
rainy periods, so these explosions are not necessarily indicative of
any increase in activity. Since this type of event may occur again,
however, IG-EPN recommended that visitors not descend into the
caldera. This was mentioned in a 2 February news report in El Pais,
which further mentioned that strong rains that had recently fallen in
Quito and the crater.



As of 14 February, Ash Advisories cataloged by the Washington VAAC's
lacked reports describing the 1 February, or any subsequent, phreatic
eruptions.



Geologic Summary. Guagua Pichincha and the older Pleistocene Rucu
Pichincha stratovolcanoes form a broad volcanic massif that rises
immediately to the W of Ecuador's capital city, Quito. A lava dome is
located at the head of a 6-km-wide breached caldera that formed during
a late-Pleistocene slope failure of Guagua Pichincha about 50,000
years ago. Subsequent late-Pleistocene and Holocene eruptions from the
central vent in the breached caldera consisted of explosive activity
with pyroclastic flows accompanied by periodic growth and destruction
of the central lava dome. Many minor eruptions have occurred since the
beginning of the Spanish era at Guagua Pichincha, which is one of
Ecuador's most active volcanoes. The largest historical eruption took
place in 1660, when ash fell over a 1,000 km radius, accumulating to
30 cm depth in Quito. Pyroclastic flows and surges also occurred,
primarily to the W, and affected agricultural activity, causing great
economic losses.



Information Contacts: Instituto Geofisico Escuela Politecnica Nacional
(IG-EPN), Apartado 17-01-2759, Quito, Ecuador (URL:
http://www.epn.edu.ec/~igeo/).

==============================================================
To unsubscribe from the volcano list, send the message:
signoff volcano
to: listserv@xxxxxxx, or write to: volcano-request@xxxxxxxx

To contribute to the volcano list, send your message to:
volcano@xxxxxxxx  Please do not send attachments.
==============================================================

[Index of Archives]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [Earthquake Notices]     [USGS News]     [Yosemite Campgrounds]     [Steve's Art]     [Hot Springs Forum]

  Powered by Linux