?Hi all, I am new to vlan.I have some doubts with respect to vlan. 1) what is native vlan. 2)I want to know IVR[Inter vlan Rounting].How this works .I have understood the how comunication happens within vlans.If possible tell me the URL regarding this. Thanks and Regards. Srihari. On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 vlan-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote : >Send Vlan mailing list submissions to > vlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.lanforge.com/mailman/listinfo/vlan >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > vlan-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > >You can reach the person managing the list at > vlan-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of Vlan digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. RE: VLAN ID range in Hexadecimal (Vishwas Manral) > 2. RE: VLAN ID range in Hexadecimal (JOJAN) > 3. RE: VLAN ID range in Hexadecimal (Vishwas Manral) > 4. Unable to see Cisco Native VLAN on a BSD box (Johan Henes) > 5. RE: Unable to see Cisco Native VLAN on a BSD box (Wojciech Tryc) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 21:24:53 -0800 > From: "Vishwas Manral" <Vishwas@xxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: RE: [VLAN] VLAN ID range in Hexadecimal >To: "Linux 802.1Q VLAN" <vlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Message-ID: > <BB6D74C75CC76A419B6D6FA7C38317B26A2860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > >Cyprian, > >Vlan Id Ranges from 0 to 4095 = 0 to (2^12 - 1). In Hexadecimal it is equivalent to 0x0 to 0xFFF. You can probably use a calculator to do these basic calculations. > >Thanks, >Vishwas >________________________________________ > From: vlan-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vlan-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Cyprian Clement >Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 12:55 AM >To: Linux 802.1Q VLAN >Subject: [VLAN] VLAN ID range in Hexadecimal > >Hello Community, > >does anyone know the standard number of?digits reserved for vlan in hexadecimal?. i.e. is it 3-digit or 4-digit number or more in hexadecimal?. All in is currently you can define up to 4096 vlans. > >As always, thanks in advance. > >Regards, > >Cyprian. >------------- >Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:18:09 +0530 > From: JOJAN <JOJAN@xxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: RE: [VLAN] VLAN ID range in Hexadecimal >To: "'Linux 802.1Q VLAN'" <vlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Message-ID: <273ED687CFB4D411986100306E0013BC05941416@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > >with 0 and FFF reserved, you can have only 4094 VLANs. > >-----Original Message----- > From: vlan-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:vlan-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Vishwas Manral >Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 10:55 AM >To: Linux 802.1Q VLAN >Subject: RE: [VLAN] VLAN ID range in Hexadecimal > > >Cyprian, > >Vlan Id Ranges from 0 to 4095 = 0 to (2^12 - 1). In Hexadecimal it is >equivalent to 0x0 to 0xFFF. You can probably use a calculator to do these >basic calculations. > >Thanks, >Vishwas >________________________________________ > From: vlan-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vlan-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >Behalf Of Cyprian Clement >Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 12:55 AM >To: Linux 802.1Q VLAN >Subject: [VLAN] VLAN ID range in Hexadecimal > >Hello Community, > >does anyone know the standard number of?digits reserved for vlan in >hexadecimal?. i.e. is it 3-digit or 4-digit number or more in hexadecimal?. >All in is currently you can define up to 4096 vlans. > >As always, thanks in advance. > >Regards, > >Cyprian. >------------- >Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com > > >_______________________________________________ >Vlan mailing list >Vlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx >http://www.lanforge.com/mailman/listinfo/vlan > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- > "This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use >of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged >information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the >sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. > > Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, >printing or copying of this email or any action taken upon this e-mail is >strictly prohibited and may be unlawful." >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 3 >Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:05:58 -0800 > From: "Vishwas Manral" <Vishwas@xxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: RE: [VLAN] VLAN ID range in Hexadecimal >To: "Linux 802.1Q VLAN" <vlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Message-ID: > <BB6D74C75CC76A419B6D6FA7C38317B26A2866@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > >Good point. Actually VLAN 1 is reserved for internal use in most of the systems. > >-Vishwas > >-----Original Message----- > From: vlan-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vlan-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of JOJAN >Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 1:18 PM >To: 'Linux 802.1Q VLAN' >Subject: RE: [VLAN] VLAN ID range in Hexadecimal > >with 0 and FFF reserved, you can have only 4094 VLANs. > >-----Original Message----- > From: vlan-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:vlan-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Vishwas Manral >Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 10:55 AM >To: Linux 802.1Q VLAN >Subject: RE: [VLAN] VLAN ID range in Hexadecimal > > >Cyprian, > >Vlan Id Ranges from 0 to 4095 = 0 to (2^12 - 1). In Hexadecimal it is >equivalent to 0x0 to 0xFFF. You can probably use a calculator to do these >basic calculations. > >Thanks, >Vishwas >________________________________________ > From: vlan-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vlan-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >Behalf Of Cyprian Clement >Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 12:55 AM >To: Linux 802.1Q VLAN >Subject: [VLAN] VLAN ID range in Hexadecimal > >Hello Community, > >does anyone know the standard number of?digits reserved for vlan in >hexadecimal?. i.e. is it 3-digit or 4-digit number or more in hexadecimal?. >All in is currently you can define up to 4096 vlans. > >As always, thanks in advance. > >Regards, > >Cyprian. >------------- >Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com > > >_______________________________________________ >Vlan mailing list >Vlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx >http://www.lanforge.com/mailman/listinfo/vlan > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- > "This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use >of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged >information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the >sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. > > Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, >printing or copying of this email or any action taken upon this e-mail is >strictly prohibited and may be unlawful." >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >_______________________________________________ >Vlan mailing list >Vlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx >http://www.lanforge.com/mailman/listinfo/vlan > > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 4 >Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 16:00:07 +0100 > From: "Johan Henes" <johan@xxxxxxxx> >Subject: [VLAN] Unable to see Cisco Native VLAN on a BSD box >To: "Linux 802.1Q VLAN" <vlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Message-ID: <003c01c52c94$56e7a210$af0b2e0a@xxxxxxxxxxx> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi ! >I have set up a dot1q trunk between a Cisco switch and an OpenBSD 3.1 box. Everything works beautifully except of VLAN 1 which is default Native VLAN on the Cisco switch. I am not able to see traffic on this interface on the BSD box until I change Native VLAN on the switch to something else. This of course solves the problem, but I am just curious - is this correct behaviour ?? > >I know that Native VLAN is untagged, but if I connect a Cisco router instead of the BSD box, Also VLAN 1 (native vlan) is reachable via a VLAN-subinterface on the router.... > >(And I do of course see the traffic on the physical interface. it is just that i want it to go to the vlan-interface :-) > >Best regards, > >Johan >-------------- next part -------------- >An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >URL: http://www.lanforge.com/pipermail/vlan/attachments/20050319/b09944c8/attachment-0001.htm > >------------------------------ > >Message: 5 >Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 10:24:00 -0500 > From: "Wojciech Tryc" <Wojciech.Tryc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: RE: [VLAN] Unable to see Cisco Native VLAN on a BSD box >To: "Linux 802.1Q VLAN" <vlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Message-ID: > <C27FDFC2C3916348AD20F6B44605A94902746C6D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >VLAN 1 on Cisco is their default VLAN, thus only untagged frames will be >processed (I believe). Your OpenBSD box creates Tagged frames on VLAN 1 >so it doesn't work. You could use assigned the IP address to the >interface on top of creating subinterfaces (VLANs), then it should work >as the non-vlan interface would send untagged packets. >Am I Correct? >Wojtek > > _____ > > From: Johan Henes [mailto:johan@xxxxxxxx] >Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 10:00 AM >To: Linux 802.1Q VLAN >Subject: [VLAN] Unable to see Cisco Native VLAN on a BSD box > > > Hi ! > >I have set up a dot1q trunk between a Cisco switch and an OpenBSD 3.1 >box. Everything works beautifully except of VLAN 1 which is default >Native VLAN on the Cisco switch. I am not able to see traffic on this >interface on the BSD box until I change Native VLAN on the switch to >something else. This of course solves the problem, but I am just curious >- is this correct behaviour ?? > >I know that Native VLAN is untagged, but if I connect a Cisco router >instead of the BSD box, Also VLAN 1 (native vlan) is reachable via a >VLAN-subinterface on the router.... > >(And I do of course see the traffic on the physical interface. it is >just that i want it to go to the vlan-interface :-) > >Best regards, > >Johan > >-------------- next part -------------- >An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >URL: http://www.lanforge.com/pipermail/vlan/attachments/20050319/7f217983/attachment-0001.htm > >------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Vlan mailing list >Vlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx >http://www.lanforge.com/mailman/listinfo/vlan > > >End of Vlan Digest, Vol 7, Issue 3 >********************************** -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.lanforge.com/pipermail/vlan/attachments/20050321/6c2a1fcc/attachment.htm
