[VLAN] Trunk problem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 07:13:10PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 05:08:17PM +0200, Magnus Ternstr?m wrote:
> > I've set up eth1.1 - 5 and addressed them with separate 192.168.*
> > networks.
> > The Cisco 3500XL is configured for trunking with dot1q on fa0/1.
> 
> I guess you know that VLAN 1 always is the default VLAN in Cisco
> equipment, meaning that all untagged packets on ports not in any VLAN
> will belong there.

More importantly, if VLAN 1 is the native VLAN (which it is by default),
packets on VLAN 1 will *not* be sent tagged on a dot1q trunk.  Your best
bet is to avoid using VLAN 1 for real traffic with Cisco equipment.

-- 
Steve Snodgrass * ssnodgra@xxxxxxxxxx * Network and Unix Guru(?) at Large
Geek Code: GCS d? s: a C++ U++++$ P+++ L++ w PS+ 5++ b++ DI+ D++ e++ r+++ y+*
"If you want to be somebody else, change your mind."  -Sister Hazel

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux