Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix the virt-install progress bar file size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/9/22 4:33 AM, Toshiki Sonoda wrote:
> Fix the virt-install progress bar file size
> 
> These patches improve about the virt-install progress bar.
> 
> Since version 4.0, implementation of the progress bar has changed.
> If the file copy about vmlinuz and initrd.img completes quickly 
> (less than self.update_period),
> the process ends without updating the progress bar.
> In short, the result is printed as 0B.
> 
> In addition, 0B is printed at "Creating domain" printing.
> 0B is meaningless and can be misled as a failed transfer.
> 
> Toshiki Sonoda (3):
>   virtinstall: Improve the progress bar output by meter.end()
>   virtinstall: Fix the allocating disk size printed by the progress bar
>   virtinstall: Hide total_size in the progress bar if it doesn't need
> 
>  tests/data/meter/meter7.txt      |  2 ++
>  tests/data/meter/meter8.txt      |  6 ++++
>  tests/data/meter/meter9.txt      |  4 +++
>  tests/test_misc.py               | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  virtManager/object/domain.py     |  2 +-
>  virtinst/_progresspriv.py        | 12 +++++---
>  virtinst/diskbackend.py          |  3 +-
>  virtinst/install/urlfetcher.py   |  6 ++--
>  virtinst/install/volumeupload.py |  3 +-
>  virtinst/progress.py             |  4 +--
>  virtinst/storage.py              |  3 +-
>  11 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tests/data/meter/meter7.txt
>  create mode 100644 tests/data/meter/meter8.txt
>  create mode 100644 tests/data/meter/meter9.txt
> 

Thanks for the report, and the patches! I see all the reported issues
with this reproducer:

./virt-install --connect test:///default --location
tests/data/fakemedia/fake-f26-netinst.iso

Patch #1 was a bit tough to understand, since it's adding test cases,
internal API change, and behavior change all at once. In the process of
trying to understand it, I found a simpler fix that doesn't require any
internal API change. I pushed that as patch #1, and pushed your patches
#2 and #3 on top of that, with some adjustments due to patch #1 being
different.

Please test git and confirm the changes still fix your issues

Thanks,
Cole




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Virtualization]     [KVM Development]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux