On Friday, 15 February 2019 13:28:57 CET Pino Toscano wrote: > I recently sent the addition of the "rolling" release status to > osinfo-db/libosinfo: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libosinfo/2019-February/msg00078.html > > Once the above patch series is accepted, virt-manager can tweak its EOL > detection: if a distro has no EOL date set, then always consider it > supported. This way, existing rolling distros (e.g. Gentoo, Arch Linux, > etc) are always show when searching for a distro without enabling the > EOLed distros; OTOH, if a rolling distro is discontinued, adding a EOL > date for it will hide it by default. > > RFC because of the dependency with another patch series which is still > pending. Of course, comments on the approach (or even on that series) > are welcome. BTW, the patches for libosinfo/osinfo-db were accepted. -- Pino Toscano
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
