On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:10:10AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 05:56:21PM +0200, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> >
> > Yup, that was also my feeling when finding the doc-only spice-gtk
> > package :)
> >
> > I agree, is it in Fedora? el7 has just spice-gtk3 rpm
> > Pavel
>
> Yes, Fedora which still has
> %files
> %doc AUTHORS
> %doc COPYING
> %doc README
> %doc NEWS
> %{_mandir}/man1/spice-client.1*
>
> In el7, these files have been moved to the spice-gtk package.
> Imo, at least COPYING would fit better in spice-glib as this is the
> lower-level package, and I prefer to have the license installed
> on all systems using one of the packages generated from spice-gtk source
> rpm.
Yes for Fedora packaging compliance it in fact must be in spice-glib, or
in every sub-RPM - having it in spice-gtk which never gets pulled in by
any deps is non-compliant packaging.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
_______________________________________________
virt-tools-list mailing list
virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
