On 07/20/2016 02:56 AM, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:38:06PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: >> On 07/19/2016 12:10 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >>> It appears that quite a few tests in virt-manager are currently >>> failing. I'm unclear if this is due to genuine libvirt regressions, >>> or the tests were relying on undefined behaviour which has now >>> changed in libvirt >>> >> >> Hmm, I'm not sure either, I can't reproduce with current libvirt.git... > > Well, the ci.centos.org runs upstream virt-manager with upstream libvirt only on > fedora-rawhide, on all other systems upstream virt-manager uses system libvirt. > We should make the test pass also with older libvirt, not only with upstream. > I did try running virt-manager test suite against stock f23 libvirt... I kinda botched it though since I was on an old virt-manager branch and f23 libvirt wasn't up to date. But trying again with up to date virt-manager.git, the test suite works fine against both f23 libvirt _and_ libvirt.git. My reading of the CI report is that it was testing libvirt.git anyways, but I'm not positive about that... Thanks, Cole _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
