On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Marc-André Lureau <mlureau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> >> For your answers for 1) and 2): >> I'll retest it and open the necessary bugs. Would be great to, at >> least, mention the limitations in the commit logs. >> > > Hmm? where? it's quite unrelated and unclear what's going on. The ML archive is already good enough imho. Hmm. Hmm. You're right. ML archive is good enough for this. > > >> So, how is it nowadays? Does Phodav allow to share more than one >> folder at the same time? > > No Aha. So the UI we have is okay for now. > >> If it is the case I do not see it as an improvement, but as something >> that could be done for this first implementation. >> Otherwise, okay, we can live with it as it is now .. >> >> Ah, it just reminds me another thing that I didn't test ... what about >> sharing the same folder with more than one guest? What about sharing >> the same folder as read-only with one guest and as read-write with >> another, does it work? > > It should work fine, even in the same process, since the server is per Spice session. However "locking" is another subject that I don't think we need to discuss here.. If it works fine, then okay. My main concern is about to expose something that could cause big problems. Like, in my case, I'd like to share pretty much the same folder between a few VMs and if it could be problem would worth, at least, adding a waning about this. -- Fabiano Fidêncio _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
