Re: [virt-manager PATCH] Make SpiceClientGtk optional

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 04:11:17PM +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:33:44AM -0500, Cole Robinson wrote:
> > In fedora, spice-gtk is built on all archs + secondary archs, which includes
> > arm, ppc, and s390 at least.
> > 
> > However spice-server is build restricted to x86 and arm, but as I understand
> > it spice-gtk doesn't need to build against spice-server, just the arch
> > independent spice-protocol. So I'd suggest debian follow that same setup.
> > Let us know if you need more info
> 
> To be honest, I don't expect spice-gtk (nor spice-server) to work on a big endian
> architecture. I'd be very happy to be proven wrong by someone who tested it
> though ;)

I'd be happy to know the results of this too. I can carry the patch
Debian only until we know for sure (I don't have anything big endian
to test at hand atm though).
Cheers,
 -- Guido

_______________________________________________
virt-tools-list mailing list
virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Virtualization]     [KVM Development]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux