Re: [virt-manager PATCH] Make SpiceClientGtk optional

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey,

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:33:44AM -0500, Cole Robinson wrote:
> In fedora, spice-gtk is built on all archs + secondary archs, which includes
> arm, ppc, and s390 at least.
> 
> However spice-server is build restricted to x86 and arm, but as I understand
> it spice-gtk doesn't need to build against spice-server, just the arch
> independent spice-protocol. So I'd suggest debian follow that same setup.
> Let us know if you need more info

To be honest, I don't expect spice-gtk (nor spice-server) to work on a big endian
architecture. I'd be very happy to be proven wrong by someone who tested it
though ;)

Christophe

Attachment: pgpN4pIUFCGcY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
virt-tools-list mailing list
virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Virtualization]     [KVM Development]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux