On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 15:34 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:30:07PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > > When the support to use numpad accelerators for zoom-{in,out,reset} > > was added (3a168815), by mistake, we have added duplicated buttons > > in View -> Zoom. > > --- > > src/virt-viewer.xml | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/src/virt-viewer.xml b/src/virt-viewer.xml > > index 760550e..6f2eebb 100644 > > --- a/src/virt-viewer.xml > > +++ b/src/virt-viewer.xml > > @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ > > <object class="GtkImageMenuItem" id="menu-view-kp-zoom-in"> > > <property name="accel_path"><virt-viewer>/view/kp-zoom-in</property> > > <property name="label">gtk-zoom-in</property> > > - <property name="visible">True</property> > > + <property name="visible">False</property> > > <property name="can_focus">False</property> > > <property name="use_action_appearance">False</property> > > <property name="use_underline">True</property> > > @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ > > <object class="GtkImageMenuItem" id="menu-view-kp-zoom-out"> > > <property name="accel_path"><virt-viewer>/view/kp-zoom-out</property> > > <property name="label">gtk-zoom-out</property> > > - <property name="visible">True</property> > > + <property name="visible">False</property> > > <property name="can_focus">False</property> > > <property name="use_action_appearance">False</property> > > <property name="use_underline">True</property> > > @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ > > <object class="GtkImageMenuItem" id="menu-view-kp-zoom-reset"> > > <property name="accel_path"><virt-viewer>/view/kp-zoom-reset</property> > > <property name="label">gtk-zoom-100</property> > > - <property name="visible">True</property> > > + <property name="visible">False</property> > > <property name="can_focus">False</property> > > <property name="use_action_appearance">False</property> > > <property name="use_underline">True</property> > > Err, we should delete the duplicate menu objects entirely rather than > just making them invisible I don't think so, unless we could have two accel_path for the same object, what does not seem to be possible (that was the reason for the 3a168815). Best Regards, -- Fabiano Fidêncio _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list