On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 06:59:50PM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Has anyone actually asked us to provide a extra user installer ? If there > > is no user demand for it, then I don't think we should do this, since as > > you say, it will cause confusion as to which is best to download. > > > It's mostly to deprecate the still around NSIS installer, for > non-privileged CAB/ActiveX installation mechanism. > > Imho, the user installer shouldn't be published, only used by those who need it. I don't think that is really enough of a reason to add this additional installer. The NSIS installer was always said to be experimental / unsupported. We don't need to provide an upgrade path for it. Just tell people to remove it & use the primary installer. > Also, I think it is time to remove the NSIS based installer. Yep, that's fine. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
