On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:14:37AM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > Also, which installer are you planning to ship on spice-space.org? Both? > > Only one of these? > > No idea either. It takes a lot of space though, but space is cheap, isn't > it? Otherwise I would stick to machine installer only. My point is that most people don't want to have to choose between 4 different links when they are looking for a Windows SPICE client. The fact that the changelog does not explain at all why we want such an installer (it only says 'because we can') does not help making an informed review of the patch. I'm technically fine with the patch (ie ACK), but would like to have some rationale about why we want this (will be useful when someone wonders 5 years from now why such an installer was introduced ;) Christophe
Attachment:
pgpUg3SFPPMaT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
