On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 03:42:16PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > as a nice improvement to the codebase even if there were not the datamap >> > changes on top of it. >> >> Thanks for the explanation and I would agree with you to everything >> you said here but this kinda breaks API/ABI cause user is now expected >> to use a different _new(). I'll repeat the question I asked before: >> How does the app know which _new() to use? Now that we'll be expecting >> OS-specific values in scripts, any existing code (or even future code >> that uses the existing _new()) will still pass us OS-independent >> config that did not see the transformation. > > Ah, good point about the ABI break, I'll have to think about this. In the > mean time, can we get the 3 first patches in this series in? I think this > all that is needed for the > osinfo_db_identify_media/osinfo_media_get_languages series, which would be > nice to land... Yeah. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
