On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 03:42:16PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > as a nice improvement to the codebase even if there were not the datamap > > changes on top of it. > > Thanks for the explanation and I would agree with you to everything > you said here but this kinda breaks API/ABI cause user is now expected > to use a different _new(). I'll repeat the question I asked before: > How does the app know which _new() to use? Now that we'll be expecting > OS-specific values in scripts, any existing code (or even future code > that uses the existing _new()) will still pass us OS-independent > config that did not see the transformation. Ah, good point about the ABI break, I'll have to think about this. In the mean time, can we get the 3 first patches in this series in? I think this all that is needed for the osinfo_db_identify_media/osinfo_media_get_languages series, which would be nice to land... Christophe
Attachment:
pgpB6hm9zWZjs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
