On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 04:12:10PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> --- >> data/oses/windows.xml.in | 2 +- >> .../en_windows_8_enterprise_x86_dvd_917587.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> create mode 100644 test/isodata/windows/win8/en_windows_8_enterprise_x86_dvd_917587.iso.txt >> >> diff --git a/data/oses/windows.xml.in b/data/oses/windows.xml.in >> index 2a58d8d..851c1b7 100644 >> --- a/data/oses/windows.xml.in >> +++ b/data/oses/windows.xml.in >> @@ -737,7 +737,7 @@ >> >> <media arch="i386"> >> <iso> >> - <volume-id>HB1_CCPA_X86FRE</volume-id> >> + <volume-id>(HB1_CCPA_X86FRE)|(HRM_CENA_X86)</volume-id> > > Right .. as you guessed I downloaded the 32 bit ISO by accident :-( > > It's a bit unfortunate that libosinfo isn't distinguishing between > different editions of the base OS (ie. Desktop vs Server vs > Enterprise). We know of this issue and have plans to address it (I even have half-baked patch). Just don't know whats the best approach: Separate media entries for each variant or separate OS entries for each variant? -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
