On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
<berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 02:37:05AM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>> From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Don't know how this had gone unnoticed for 4 releases now.
>> ---
>> osinfo/libosinfo.syms | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/osinfo/libosinfo.syms b/osinfo/libosinfo.syms
>> index 18415e0..de1ff18 100644
>> --- a/osinfo/libosinfo.syms
>> +++ b/osinfo/libosinfo.syms
>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> -LIBOSINFO_0.0.1 {
>> +LIBOSINFO_0.0.6 {
>> global:
>> osinfo_db_get_type;
>> osinfo_db_new;
>
> Ordinarily we should never change this. The only reason we
> have changed it in libvirt-glib, is because we have been
> intentionally breaking the API with each release so far.
>
> So I don't think we have a reason todo this in libosinfo
The only reason I came to notice this was that I added a new function
and it wasn't appearing in the symbols list of .so file. Once I fixed
this, it was all of a suddenly getting there.
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124
