On 09.03.2018 11:55, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 09.03.2018 11:51, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 11:30:36 +0100
Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 01.03.2018 10:22, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:01:23 +0100
> Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On 27.02.2018 17:58, Patrick Boettcher wrote: >> > On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:54:35 +0100
>> > Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >> >> Hello Patrick,
>> >> >> >> your scan doesn't contain the NIT, which is where the
>> >> transponder innformation is broadcast. Can you scan that, too,
>> >> please? >> > >> > Hi Klaus,
>> > >> > NIT attached (from another multiplex with the same symptoms). >> >> DVB-DescriptorTag: 90 (0x5a) [=
>> terrestrial_delivery_system_descriptor] descriptor_length: 11
>> (0x0b) Center frequency: 0xffffffff (= 42949672.095 kHz)
>> >> @@ -219,6 +219,8 @@
>> cDvbTransponderParameters dtp;
>> int Source = cSource::FromData(cSource::stTerr);
>> int Frequency = Frequencies[0] =
>> sd->getFrequency() * 10;
>> + Frequency = Transponder() * 1000000;//XXX
>> + dsyslog("Frequency = %08X, Transponder = %d",
>> sd->getFrequency(), Transponder());//XXX static int Bandwidths[] =
>> { 8000000, 7000000, 6000000, 5000000, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
>> dtp.SetBandwidth(Bandwidths[sd->getBandwidth()]); static int
>> Constellations[] = { QPSK, QAM_16, QAM_64, QAM_AUTO }; > > It works. I had to have VDR recreate the channels because it was
> mixing things up with the already existing ones.
> > As to why the frequency is set to "-10" I don't know (yet), but I
> remember it has always been like this since 2005.
> > Initial tuning files have always contained all active frequencies
> for their region, because the NIT did not set the center frequencies
> correctly.
> > It might be because the multiplexed transport streams are generated
> centrally and then distributed to all the base-stations where they
> are emitted as-is but on different frequencies depending on the
> region.
> > What can we do to get this upstream?
I'm afraid I don't see how this case can be handled correctly.
Maybe somebody else has an idea?
One approach might be to ignore frequencies for DVB-T channels update
during NIT parsing (in France only?).
From my experiences with DVB-T SetTopBoxes using the NIT for
new channel-discovery is rarely done. No customer of my ex-employer was
using it - scanning was entirely based on continuous frequency-band
scanning with a spare demod.
That would be my idea. But I don't know whether this can be easily
applied to VDR.
Sorry, of course it has to be "break" instead of "continue":
--- nit.c 2016/12/23 14:16:59 4.4
+++ nit.c 2018/03/09 10:57:21
@@ -216,6 +216,8 @@
break;
case SI::TerrestrialDeliverySystemDescriptorTag: {
SI::TerrestrialDeliverySystemDescriptor *sd = (SI::TerrestrialDeliverySystemDescriptor *)d;
+ if (sd->getFrequency() == 0xFFFFFFFF)
+ break;
cDvbTransponderParameters dtp;
int Source = cSource::FromData(cSource::stTerr);
int Frequency = Frequencies[0] = sd->getFrequency() * 10;
Klaus
_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
