Re: RFC: one or many positioners?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Klaus Schmidinger
<Klaus.Schmidinger@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I think I would be interested to have possibility for multiple positioners
>> later, if VDR would only support it.
>
> There doesn't seem to be such a big demand for multiple positioners,
> so I guess I'll take the easy way and assume there is only one.

For the sake of future-proofing, maybe the motor stuff can be added in
such a way that it wouldn't take a total rewrite to support
multi-motor setups in the event it's decided later on such support
would be advantageous. Since motor support is finally arriving, we
don't want to undershoot (although single motor setups certainly seem
like the easy majority).

Another consideration is what setups will look like once VDR advances
into server/client design. Will those setups be more likely to have
multiple motors? I dunno, but it's worth asking imo.

_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux