Re: RFC: one or many positioners?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22.04.2013 13:35, Luca Olivetti wrote:
Al 22/04/13 11:11, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit:

I'd suggest a parameter with the number of steps to move (and for "step"
I mean a "pulse", not the next/previous stored satellite position).

I don't see the need for a "number of steps".

Well, I use it from time to time. Say I move step by step to the west
and, after e.g. 5 steps, I discover the signal is getting worse.
Instead of hitting 5 times StepEast, I position over the "x steps east"
soft button, push 5 on the remote, push ok and I'm at the starting position.
Better yet, I move 10 steps east at once to try if going to the other
side improves things or not.

OK, I'll change the interface accordingly.

Klaus

_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux