Re: RFC: one or many positioners?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21.04.2013 20:36, Luca Olivetti wrote:
Al 21/04/13 15:52, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit:

One more observation

   virtual void StepEast(void) {}
           ///< Move the dish one step to the east.
   virtual void StepWest(void) {}
           ///< Move the dish one step to the west.

I'd suggest a parameter with the number of steps to move (and for "step"
I mean a "pulse", not the next/previous stored satellite position).

I don't see the need for a "number of steps".
This function will be used to fine-tune the position of the dish, so it
shall make a very small move.
I'll add this to the description:

  virtual void StepEast(void) {}
          ///< Move the dish one step to the east.
          ///< A "step" is the smallest possible movement the positioner can make, which
          ///< is typically 0.1 degrees.
  virtual void StepWest(void) {}
          ///< Move the dish one step to the west.
          ///< A "step" is the smallest possible movement the positioner can make, which
          ///< is typically 0.1 degrees.


Klaus

_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux