Re: Local frontend - using XBMC strm vs vdr-sxfe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2012-03-09 16:34, Bio H wrote:
i also have struggled for this holy grail
xbmc would really be the ideal interface for me (just cant beat this
flexibility - try playing a .bin / .img over a network which is .rar'd -
cant do this on vdr)
i like the xbmc plugins and flexibility, for the most part. :)
for last few months i've been trying xvdr, but i have to say i have
mixed feelings/results on this, and it's not very stable (from my
experience)
the deprecated vnsiserver/client has fallen off the radar by now... not
many options other than streamdev/strm files.

i found i kept getting warnings about insufficient buffers with the setting

engine.buffers.video_num_frames:22

, so i bumped that up to 35

I got the warnings, too, but ended back at 22 when it didn't make a visible difference. This is on an Atom box with scarce resources, so ymmv.

only other setting i'd suggest re-examining is the

engine.performance.memcpy_method:libc

at least on my system, kernel is faster. :)  autodetect should be fine
for this... ?
(it should test all of them)

I started out with auto detect but then set it to libc which it selected. The start up delay for auto is probably small, so I guess it's a safe bet in most cases.

Cheers, Jonas

_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux