Re: Client/server implementation after VDR 2.0: Do not reinvent the whole wheel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul Menzel <paulepanter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Am Donnerstag, den 01.03.2012, 15:31 +0100 schrieb Gero:
>> On Thursday 01 March 2012 - 10:31:37, Paul Menzel wrote:
>> > On Thursday 01 March 2012 - 07:03:03, VDR User wrote:
>> >
>> > I just want to throw in, that there are several programs already using a
>> > client/server approach (MythTV [1], Tvheadend [2], …) and we should not
>> > reinvent the wheel when designing the new implementation. 
>> 
>> I'd like to oppose headline and last statement.
>> 
>> "We" can do better, so let's go ahead :)
>
> It looks like my message was not clear enough. I meant we should look at
> what other projects implemented and tried and take the good ideas and
> use those. So of course the result will probably be better.
>
> But cooperation like on using already existing protocols would be a big
> advantage, because in this way already existing clients or servers can
> be used to or tested against.

Do you also imply the use of things like git/github ?

-- 

_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux