Re: Client/server implementation after VDR 2.0: Do not reinvent the whole wheel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Donnerstag, den 01.03.2012, 15:31 +0100 schrieb Gero:
> On Thursday 01 March 2012 - 10:31:37, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > On Thursday 01 March 2012 - 07:03:03, VDR User wrote:
> >
> > I just want to throw in, that there are several programs already using a
> > client/server approach (MythTV [1], Tvheadend [2], …) and we should not
> > reinvent the wheel when designing the new implementation. 
> 
> I'd like to oppose headline and last statement.
> 
> "We" can do better, so let's go ahead :)

It looks like my message was not clear enough. I meant we should look at
what other projects implemented and tried and take the good ideas and
use those. So of course the result will probably be better.

But cooperation like on using already existing protocols would be a big
advantage, because in this way already existing clients or servers can
be used to or tested against.

[…]


Thanks,

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux