On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:39:46 +0100 (BST) Dominic Morris <dom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Dominic Evans wrote: > > On 25 October 2011 14:27, Tony Houghton <h@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:54:36 +0100 (BST) > >> Dominic Morris <dom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>> Complete tables are here: > >>> > >>> http://rst38.org.uk/vdr/freesat_tables_complete.zip > >> > >> Those are the ones with holes in aren't they? Stuart Morris said > >> he had to "port" the tables from eepg. > > > > No, I believe EEPG took these exact tables from the same source(s) > > as Dom got them. Its just the freesat.diff hadn't been updated to > > contain the complete tables 'in-patch'. > > That's correct. The ones in the patch are those deduced through > observation, there's an updated version of those here: > http://rst38.org.uk/vdr/freesat_tables_20081027.zip Those files are > completely legitimate. > > The "complete tables" were extracted from an OTA firmware upgrade and > are complete. They may have dubious legality. Which are newer, "complete" or "20081027"? I was using "complete" with the patch before I switched to eepg and I'm pretty sure I did notice holes very occasionally. _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
