On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:45:18 +0200 Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 19.08.2011 23:56, Steffen Barszus wrote: > > It's slow since it needs to iterate through all recordings > > and check file size of the index file (thats what i understand from > > Klaus comment), so divide that by number of frames of the recording > > and thats it. the directory scanner is anyway doing the same > > (iterating the video directory and pick up necessary information). > > So it wouldn't add anything substantially. > > Would the attached patch work for you? > Line numbers may be off a little. Tested and looks good to me. Shows the correct result, where possible, no delay in getting the result and doesnt crash on strange recordings. Perfect :) Would love to see this in next developer version :) _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
