On 03/07/11 13:23, Frank Schmirler wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 17:15:44 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote >> The problem is that the VPS code in vdr.c avoids devices that are >> currently recording. And since this is a rather complex area, >> I'm not sure if it's too good an idea to change this ;-) >> >> If you feel like it, you may want to take a look at the code under >> >> // Find a device that provides the required transponder: >> >> in vdr.c. Maybe you can come up with a better solution... > > Unless I've missed something, that code does not only ignore priorities but > also the availability of CAMs. We only need the EIT data here, which is not encrypted. So it's sufficient to find a device that provides the raw transponder. Klaus _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
