On 30/10/10 02:50, VDR User wrote: > > That sounds good when you read the datasheets but real world results > are a bit different. Also, what you're referring to is encoding > comparisons all from a raw source - not mpeg2 vs. the same mpeg2 > reencoded in h264. I can't stress enough that there is no magic to be > had here for the reasons in my previous post. And I wonder is there still much room for improvement in current H264 encoders? The various MPEG 4 part 2 codecs (DivX etc) improved a great deal over time, and ISTR reading that the first H264 encoders offered almost no practical improvement over the newest part 2 codecs at the time. -- TH * http://www.realh.co.uk _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
