Re: vdr-1.7.11 (+ vdr-xine) segfaults

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jouni Karvo kirjoitti:
>
> So it seems the syscall numbers have changed at some point. I am afraid
> if the libc is now broken due to this. This has not happened to me
> before, so I don't actually know what would be the good thing to do. 
> But forcing the syscall number to 178 does not actually fix the thread
> numbers in the log file.
>   
OK.  So now I have updated from lenny to squeeze, and the thread-numbers
appear now OK.  Let's see if the actual problem persists, or not.  I'll
report then back, if it does.

Thank you for your help.

yours,
       Jouni

_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux