Re: vdr-1.7.11 (+ vdr-xine) segfaults

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hi,

Reinhard Nissl kirjoitti:
> Please report the logged error message.
>   

Actually, your patch immediately segfaulted.

But I can see some problem:  The include files from the distro tell me:

kex@vdr:/usr/include$ grep __NR_gettid */*
asm/unistd_32.h:#define __NR_gettid        224
asm/unistd_64.h:#define __NR_gettid                186
asm/unistd_64.h:__SYSCALL(__NR_gettid, sys_gettid)
bits/syscall.h:#define SYS_gettid __NR_gettid

but the kernel includes tell:

kex@vdr:/usr/src/linux/include$ grep __NR_gettid */*
asm-generic/unistd.h:#define __NR_gettid 178
asm-generic/unistd.h:__SYSCALL(__NR_gettid, sys_gettid)


So it seems the syscall numbers have changed at some point. I am afraid
if the libc is now broken due to this. This has not happened to me
before, so I don't actually know what would be the good thing to do. 
But forcing the syscall number to 178 does not actually fix the thread
numbers in the log file.

yours,
       Jouni

_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux