>>>Matthias Schwarzott<zzam@xxxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 28.06.2009 um 21:55: > On Samstag, 27. Juni 2009, Udo Richter wrote: >> On 25.06.2009 21:55, Ville Skyttä wrote: >> >> Hmmm, this could also be a great opportunity: Why not nominate someone >> >> as the official maintainer of the 1.6 stable branch? Someone who >> >> collects or back-ports fixes and smaller enhancements to the 1.6 branch, >> >> and does minor releases based on community feedback? >> > >> > Yes, please! Udo, are you volunteering? ;) >> >> Thanks for the confidence in me, but actually, I would prefer not to. >> >> I already don't have enough spare time to keep up with my existing >> projects. And I wanted to focus on moving towards 1.7.x, which is not >> feature-complete from my point of view now. >> >> This doesn't mean that I wouldn't help out in keeping 1.6.x up to date. >> But I simply cannot promise to have the necessary time. >> >> 1.6.x stable should be maintained by someone who really uses it in the >> future, to keep an eye on stability, and who has at least the time to >> keep tings from stalling for months. >> > > Well, I am not keen on doing this, but to get some progress I at least did > upload my git tree based on vdr-1.6.0-2 version of > git://vdr.gekrumbel.de/vdr.git to github: > > http://github.com/zzam/vdr/tree/stable > git://github.com/zzam/vdr.git > Branch "stable" > > It contains up to now only my three patches I already posted in this thread. > > Regards > Matthias > Well, I don't know if this is the right way and Klaus probably won't like it. Maybe we should wait, until Klaus is back from his holidays, so that he can participate in this discussion. Regards, Joachim _______________________________________________vdr mailing listvdr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
