On Samstag, 27. Juni 2009, Udo Richter wrote: > On 25.06.2009 21:55, Ville Skyttä wrote: > >> Hmmm, this could also be a great opportunity: Why not nominate someone > >> as the official maintainer of the 1.6 stable branch? Someone who > >> collects or back-ports fixes and smaller enhancements to the 1.6 branch, > >> and does minor releases based on community feedback? > > > > Yes, please! Udo, are you volunteering? ;) > > Thanks for the confidence in me, but actually, I would prefer not to. > > I already don't have enough spare time to keep up with my existing > projects. And I wanted to focus on moving towards 1.7.x, which is not > feature-complete from my point of view now. > > This doesn't mean that I wouldn't help out in keeping 1.6.x up to date. > But I simply cannot promise to have the necessary time. > > 1.6.x stable should be maintained by someone who really uses it in the > future, to keep an eye on stability, and who has at least the time to > keep tings from stalling for months. > Well, I am not keen on doing this, but to get some progress I at least did upload my git tree based on vdr-1.6.0-2 version of git://vdr.gekrumbel.de/vdr.git to github: http://github.com/zzam/vdr/tree/stable git://github.com/zzam/vdr.git Branch "stable" It contains up to now only my three patches I already posted in this thread. Regards Matthias _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
