On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 00:50 +0200, Georg Acher wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 11:44:29AM +0200, Mattia Rossi wrote: > > > Is there any other setting we can work on regarding the eHd outputs, > > even if they are not listed in the reelbox-3 setup ? > > Not really. You can either use upscaling without deinterlacing (and get > tearing for real interlaced moving signals) or use the chips "deinterlacer". > That is effectively independent scaling of both fields, so the field order > is correct, but fine details show horizontal ghost lines as the > interpolation doesn't know anything about the full context. It depends a bit > on the display how visible these lines can be seen, some displays seem to > have their own filtering and hide them better. > Ok, will try to improve a little bit on the display side (i.e. bring my test machine to a couple of friend's houses and test with different VPRs, plasmas). I haven't found much documentation for my particular hardware, but it looks like scaling from 480i and 576i isn't really what it is best at .... > There is a third possibility that is currently not settable: Blending. That > mixes both fields together. So still pictures are sharp and movements are > "only" blurred and not teared. I can enable it in a "experimental" > linux.bin. > That would be great, and if you manage to get a test build I would be willing to experiment > BTW: We chose the DeCypher despite "a real" deinterlacer was missing at the > time, because we were told that it will be enabled later. The rest is > history... Alas, that happens too often with manufacturers > You can output 576i over HDMI and let the display do the deinterlacing. But > there is a dependency with the analog output that allows only 576p when the > analog port should emit 576i (CVBS etc.). For 576i over HDMI you need to > switch the analog port completely off. > Understood. > I guess the vdr 1.7 has it's own intelligence about frame-precise playback > for TS that doesn't match the requirements of the plugin... It took us quite > a while to make it work almost as responsive as on the FF, maybe there are > some dependencies with our "old" 1.4. But up to now, I had no time to try > 1.7... > Well, while this looks like a show stopper for other users, it really isn't for me (and my users) since we mainly use the skip fwd and skip backward functions when replaying Thanks and regards Mattia -- ---MR.- _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
