On 16.05.2009 22:30, Pasi Juppo wrote: > Seriously, there are many many things that are purely user error - so > what! If the SW can eliminate few of those then wouldn't it be advantage > of the SW? > > If VDR can provide assistance to solve "user error" then why not > implement it and make more users happy about VDR? Just because it is > additional work it shall not be developed? Oh, please.. Especially when > both parties will have exactly what they want - no change to existing > functionality as a default config and for those (like myself) > configuration to disable the live-TV pausing. > > Instead of looking purely on software technical factors try to look > things from the end user point of view - and I should add here: from > multipe different skilled end users point of view. > > And to put some sarcasm at the end then why don't Klaus remove remote > control support from VDR. Who wants to use clumsy, usually not 100% > working, with only few buttons and with batteries that drain out remote > control when there are oh-so-nice keyboards and mouses available which > provide every possibility there is to control VDR.. Guys, can you please just stop this bashing?! Timo Eskola has suggested a patch that implements a setup option for this at http://www.tolleri.net/vdr/vdr/vdr-1.6.0-2-pause-0.0.1.patch, and I'm going to add this to version 1.7.8. Klaus _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
