Heinrich Langos wrote: > For completeness and comparability: > > The Fujitsu Stick (vp7045) still by far beats the af9015 > in terms of resource usage with vdr. (13% vs 19% with or > 37% without hw pid filter) > > It doesn't seem to hava a hw pid filter ( at least it doesn't > react to the force_pid_filter_usage option. so here are > the results with the same setup, using the same channels and > the same vdr plugins: vp7045 does not have PID-filters. I think difference comes from different USB-transfer settings. vp7045 uses BULK packet size 4096 and af9015 uses BULK packet size 512 for USB2.0 and BULK packet size 64 for USB1.1. Therefore af9015 sends 8 times more packets than vp7045 (I guess). One thing more you can test - use USB1.1. To force USB1.1 remove USB2.0 driver by rmmod ehci_hcd. After that plug af9015 stick and look from logs it detects USB1.1 and uses PID-filters. af9015 driver now uses smaller packet size for transfer that can change load (bigger?). regards Antti -- http://palosaari.fi/ _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
