Theunis Potgieter schrieb: > On 15/01/2009, C.Scheeder <christoph@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Harald Milz schrieb: >> Hm, >> i would do it this way: >> replace your single LNB with a dual LNB, and buy 2 disec-c switches. >> then link them together this way: >> >> *----------* *-----------* *--------* >> | quad LNB |----------------| disec-c | | | >> | |- | switch |--------------| Card 1 | >> | |- *--------| 1 | | | >> | |-------|----* *-----------* *--------* >> *----------* | | >> | | >> *----------* | | *-----------* *--------* >> | dual LNB |-------* *---| disec-c | | | >> | | | switch |--------------| Card 2 | >> | |----------------| 2 | | | >> *----------* *-----------* *--------* >> >> this way you can record with both cards both Sat-positions. >> To tell vdr which port of the switches is connected to which Sat-position >> you have to setup the file disec.conf >> Christoph >> >> > So is the quad LNB now acting like dual LNB? a waste of a quad LNB? > > _______________________________________________ > vdr mailing list > vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr more or less, if the two other ports aren't used by other receivers.... but i think it's less expensive to replace only one LNB, isn't it? _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
