On 05.01.2009 00:34, Malte Schröder wrote: > On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 22:34:17 +0100 > Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> I think the option is clearly defined now. >>> I little thing that always annoyed me was that every recoding file had >>> the .vdr extension, whatever the actual contents (it seemed like the >>> file name was used as an extension). See: >>> index.vdr >>> info.vdr >>> marks.vdr >>> resume.vdr >>> >>> Maybe you will find an opportunity to improve this at the same time... >> Well, how about leaving the ".vdr" part away altogether? > > I would vote for that. Having .ts for the recording has the nice > effect that media-players and who knows what can just handle the > recordings. The other files I would consider VDR private data which > is not standardized like TS. So I do not see a point in them having > any extension at all. If they are in a .rec-directory it should be > pretty clear what a file named "index" contains. I also strongly tend to drop the '.vdr' extensions and have the files just named plain "index", "info", "marks" and "resume". Klaus _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
