On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 22:34:17 +0100 Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think the option is clearly defined now. > > I little thing that always annoyed me was that every recoding file had > > the .vdr extension, whatever the actual contents (it seemed like the > > file name was used as an extension). See: > > index.vdr > > info.vdr > > marks.vdr > > resume.vdr > > > > Maybe you will find an opportunity to improve this at the same time... > > Well, how about leaving the ".vdr" part away altogether? I would vote for that. Having .ts for the recording has the nice effect that media-players and who knows what can just handle the recordings. The other files I would consider VDR private data which is not standardized like TS. So I do not see a point in them having any extension at all. If they are in a .rec-directory it should be pretty clear what a file named "index" contains. > > Klaus > > _______________________________________________ > vdr mailing list > vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr > Greets Malte
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
