Dieter Hametner <dh+vdr@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Hi, >> > I couldn't run properly vdr 171 + s2api + extension patch + s2api patch + >> > h.264patch that's why I keep vdr 170 + s2api patch + h.264patch >> >> There's a git repository for vdr at http://git.gekrumbel.de/?p=vdr.git >> Wouldn't it be appropriate to use it to maintain a working >> vdr+s2+h264 source tree ? > > I'm maintaining that aforementioned git repository. I didn't want to host > different versions of VDR in this git repository (except the 'original > sources' git). Ok, sorry I should have asked you first. BTW is it used by a lot of people ? > This repository is intended to be used as a source for cloning own git > repositories and pulling upcoming development changes provided by Klaus > Schmidinger. If you clone it to a public git hoster (or publish it on some > own server) and add the various patches (s2api, h.264 etc.), it will be easy > for others to retrieve already patched versions of VDR to their local > computers. > > If I get informed of such a repository I will be happy to add a link on my VDR > git hosting site, to inform others about the patched VDR git existence. > > Look at git homepage http://git.or.cz/ for a list of public git hosting > providers. ok. I'm not a h264 or s2api user yet, it would be very nice if some people could maintain such a repository. It's seem messy to get these patches working and questions about them are very recurrent. -- _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
