Rainer Zocholl wrote: > ARD swaps some transponders 2nd June. > With VDR that seems to be a great pain, or? It doesn't have to, if they move their NID-TID-SID to the new transponders. VDR will then follow with the existing channel to the new transponder. Maybe they do that at the end of the simulcast phase. > OK, Channel lists can be sorted by transponder owners. > That way old and new ARD channels are nearby. > But in that mode "move" does not work anymore... It does work, and I've used it a lot. If you want to move channel 1200 where channel 5 was, just mark channel 1200 and drop it at channel 5. This works anyway, no matter whether both are right next to each other or 1195 channels apart. What I do is: Go to ARD, sort by provider (also ARD), check whether some ARD channel has a 4-digit number, mark it, and drop it on a similar channel. The 4-digit channel then takes the place of the similar channel, moving all after that one down. The actual placement may be corrected later while sorting by number again. > A further reason to make the "single LNB patch" > part of VDR... (Assuming you meant lnbsharing patch:) The SourceCaps patch users probably won't agree. As long as these two patches are not merged into one concept, a permanent integration doesn't make much sense. Cheers, Udo _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
