> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:06:19 +0200 > From: Jukka.Vaisanen@xxxxxxxxx > To: vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Straw poll: stable version 1.6.0 now? > > I usually lurk here so my vote represents the 'user' community more than > the 'dev'.. > > Yes to stable 1.6.0 with current kernel-drivers - VDR needs new users > that can get it running easily out of the box with a debian bare bones > install. The people who want HDTV support are going to go with the > dev-releases anyway. > > Yes to switching to TS recording, maybe review the metadata fileformats > a bit and allow more extendability and plugin data store there (no XML > pretty please!) > > Yes to ttextsubs too (oh sorry you didn't ask! ;) > > > - Vaizki > > > -----Original Message----- > From: vdr-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vdr-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf > Of Klaus Schmidinger > Sent: 3. helmikuuta 2008 12:17 > To: vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Straw poll: stable version 1.6.0 now? > > There has been some controversy about my recent decision to > move forward and require the "multiproto" driver for VDR in > the developer version. It is also currently rather unclear > whether the current PES recording format can be kept to handle > HDTV, or whether it would make sense (or even be feasible) > to switch to TS (as suggested by the people from RMM). > > In order to take the edge of this, I was wondering if it would > make sense to revoke the switch to the "multiproto" driver and > go straight towards a stable version 1.6.0 with what is now in > version 1.5.14. This should satisfy all those who are eagerly awaiting > a new stable version, without forcing them to make the driver switch > now. > > If we decide to go that way, I would release a version 1.5.15 with > what could become the new stable, wait until like the end of the month > to see whether it still needs some minor fixes, and call it 1.6.0 then. > I know there are still some patches out there that some would expect > to go into the next stable version, but I actually want to prepare VDR > for HDTV before looking into these patches. > > So, here's the straw poll: > > Should there be a stable version 1.6.0 now, based on what's in > version 1.5.14, but without DVB-S2 or even H.264 support? > > Yes or No? > > Klaus > > > > _______________________________________________ > vdr mailing list > vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr > > _______________________________________________ > vdr mailing list > vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr I agree, yes to stable 1.6.0 with current kernel-drivers. I also like to see ttxtsubs support in stable version. _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
