On 02/03/08 12:17, Rolf Ahrenberg wrote: > On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > >> On 02/03/08 11:43, Rolf Ahrenberg wrote: >>> No. The current features in 1.5.14 are still missing some essential key >>> features that should be included in the next stable version: DVB >>> subtitling (still missing component type support for the hard of >>> hearing), EBU subtitling, native channels.conf support for pseudo DVB >>> devices (pvrinput, iptv, analogtv), and multiple channel lists. >> I am not going to deal with these things before DVB-S2/H.264, anyway. > > The compile time selection between multiproto and normal drivers (as > done in Udo's dvb-api-emulate patch) could be used from now on. I don't > see any reason to freeze the development at this phase. > > The completition of H.264 support would be nice to have in next stable > version. The H.264 support isn't related only to DVB-S2 as it's used > already in many DVB-C and DVB-T networks nowadays. Just for the record: this would most likely pospone the next stable version for quite a while. > Also, I'd vote for making the recording format selectable, PES or TS, as > it would make the postprocessing of VDR files with existing > Windows/Linux tools a lot easier. It is either going to remain PES, or switch entirely to TS. Supporting both formats for recording is not what I intend to do. Of course, replaying PES recordings will still be possible. Klaus _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
