On Nov 22, 2007 7:30 AM, Füley István <aironet@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > To be clear: I did not say, that we don't need HD at all. I just said, > that normal TV stations should stay in SD, and only a couple of premium > (PPV, etc) channels should go HD. But the situation is more clear: not me > is gonna be who decide the future of television but the market :) If HD is no better or not real increase in quality then why switch from SD at all? If it's not any better then how have these providers, hardware makers, etc. all tricked soooo many people into believing HD -IS- better quality? Maybe it's simply because it is and all the user needs as proof is his own two eyes. Like it or not HDTV is here to stay, and it's taking over. H264 is here to stay. Change is nothing to be scared of, especially when it's for the better. The only thing scary about it is being left behind and wishing you would have done something about it sooner. Btw, do you still prefer music on cassette tape? ;) (just kidding) _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
